﻿ Action_(physics) : definition of Action_(physics) and synonyms of Action_(physics) (English)
 »
Arabic Bulgarian Chinese Croatian Czech Danish Dutch English Estonian Finnish French German Greek Hebrew Hindi Hungarian Icelandic Indonesian Italian Japanese Korean Latvian Lithuanian Malagasy Norwegian Persian Polish Portuguese Romanian Russian Serbian Slovak Slovenian Spanish Swedish Thai Turkish Vietnamese
Arabic Bulgarian Chinese Croatian Czech Danish Dutch English Estonian Finnish French German Greek Hebrew Hindi Hungarian Icelandic Indonesian Italian Japanese Korean Latvian Lithuanian Malagasy Norwegian Persian Polish Portuguese Romanian Russian Serbian Slovak Slovenian Spanish Swedish Thai Turkish Vietnamese

# definition - Action_(physics)

definition of Wikipedia

# Action (physics)

In physics, action is an attribute of the dynamics of a physical system. It is a mathematical functional which takes the trajectory, also called path or history, of the system as its argument and has a real number as its result. Generally, the action takes different values for different paths.[1]

## Introduction

Physical laws are frequently expressed as differential equations, which describe how physical quantities such as position and momentum change continuously with time. Given the initial and boundary conditions for the situation, the solution to the equation is a function describing the behavior of the system (positions and momenta of the particles) at all times and all positions within the set boundaries.

There is an alternative approach to finding equations of motion. Classical mechanics postulates that the path actually followed by a physical system is that for which the action is minimized, or, more strictly, is stationary. That is to say, the action satisfies a variational principle: the principle of stationary action (see also below). The action is defined by an integral, and the classical equations of motion of a system can be derived from minimizing the value of the action integral, rather than solving differential equations.

This simple principle provides deep insights into physics, and is an important concept in modern theoretical physics.

The equivalence of these two approaches is contained in Hamilton's principle, which states that the differential equations of motion for any physical system can be re-formulated as an equivalent integral equation. It applies not only to the classical mechanics of a single particle, but also to classical fields such as the electromagnetic and gravitational fields. Hamilton's principle has also been extended to quantum mechanics and quantum field theory, in particular path integral formulation makes use of the concept; where a physical system follows simultaneously all possible paths with probability amplitudes for each path being determined by the action for the path.[2]

## History

Action was defined in several, now obsolete, ways during the development of the concept.[3]

• Gottfried Leibniz, Johann Bernoulli and Pierre Louis Maupertuis defined the action for light as the integral of its speed or inverse speed along its path length.
• Leonhard Euler (and, possibly, Leibniz) defined action for a material particle as the integral of the particle's speed along its path through space.
• Pierre Louis Maupertuis introduced several ad hoc and contradictory definitions of action within a single article, defining action as potential energy, as virtual kinetic energy, and as a hybrid that ensured conservation of momentum in collisions.[4]

## Mathematical definition

Expressed in mathematical language, using the calculus of variations, the evolution of a physical system (i.e., how the system actually progresses from one state to another) corresponds to a stationary point (usually, a minimum) of the action.

Several different definitions of 'the action' are in common use in physics:[5][6]

• The action is usually an integral over time. But for action pertaining to fields, it may be integrated over spatial variables as well. In some cases, the action is integrated along the path followed by the physical system.
• The evolution of a physical system between two states is determined by requiring the action be minimized or, more generally, be stationary for small perturbations about the true evolution. This requirement leads to differential equations that describe the true evolution.

If the action is represented as an integral over time, taken along the path of the system between the initial time and the final time of the development of the system,[8]

$\mathcal{S} = \int_{t_1}^{t_2} L \, dt\,,$

where the integrand L is called the Lagrangian. For the action integral to be well defined the trajectory has to be bounded in time and space.

Action has the dimensions of [energy][time], and its SI unit is joulesecond.

## Action in classical physics (disambiguation)

In classical physics, the term "action" has a number of meanings.

### Action (functional)

Most commonly, the term is used for a functional $\mathcal{S}$ which takes a function of time and (for fields) space as input and returns a scalar[9][10]. In classical mechanics, the input function is the evolution q(t) of the system between two times t1 and t2, where q represent the generalized coordinates. The action $\mathcal{S}[\mathbf{q}(t)]$ is defined as the integral of the Lagrangian L for an input evolution between the two times

$\mathcal{S}[\mathbf{q}(t)] = \int_{t_1}^{t_2} L[\mathbf{q}(t),\dot{\mathbf{q}}(t),t]\, dt$

where the endpoints of the evolution are fixed and defined as $\mathbf{q}_{1} = \mathbf{q}(t_{1})$ and $\mathbf{q}_{2} = \mathbf{q}(t_{2})$. According to Hamilton's principle, the true evolution qtrue(t) is an evolution for which the action $\mathcal{S}[\mathbf{q}(t)]$ is stationary (a minimum, maximum, or a saddle point). This principle results in the equations of motion in Lagrangian mechanics.

### Abbreviated action (functional)

Usually denoted as $\mathcal{S}_{0}$, this is also a functional. Here the input function is the path followed by the physical system without regard to its parameterization by time. For example, the path of a planetary orbit is an ellipse, and the path of a particle in a uniform gravitational field is a parabola; in both cases, the path does not depend on how fast the particle traverses the path. The abbreviated action $\mathcal{S}_{0}$ is defined as the integral of the generalized momenta along a path in the generalized coordinates

$\mathcal{S}_{0} = \int \mathbf{p} \cdot d\mathbf{q} = \int p_i \,dq_i$

According to Maupertuis' principle, the true path is a path for which the abbreviated action $\mathcal{S}_{0}$ is stationary.

### Hamilton's principal function

Hamilton's principal function is defined by the Hamilton–Jacobi equations (HJE), another alternative formulation of classical mechanics. This function S is related to the functional $\mathcal{S}$ by fixing the initial time t1 and endpoint q1 and allowing the upper limits t2 and the second endpoint q2 to vary; these variables are the arguments of the function S. In other words, the action function $S$ is the indefinite integral of the Lagrangian with respect to time.

### Hamilton's characteristic function

When the total energy E is conserved, the HJE can be solved with the additive separation of variables

$S(q_{1},\dots,q_{N},t)= W(q_{1},\dots,q_{N}) - E\cdot t$,

where the time independent function W(q1, q2 ... qN) is called Hamilton's characteristic function. The physical significance of this function is understood by taking its total time derivative

$\frac{d W}{d t}= \frac{\partial W}{\partial q_i}\dot q_i=p_i\dot q_i$.

This can be integrated to give

$W(q_{1},\dots,q_{N}) = \int p_i\dot q_i \,dt = \int p_i\,dq_i$,

which is just the abbreviated action.

### Other solutions of Hamilton–Jacobi equations

The Hamilton–Jacobi equations are often solved by additive separability; in some cases, the individual terms of the solution, e.g., Sk(qk), are also called an "action".[11]

### Action of a generalized coordinate

This is a single variable Jk in the action-angle coordinates, defined by integrating a single generalized momentum around a closed path in phase space, corresponding to rotating or oscillating motion

$J_{k} = \oint p_{k} dq_{k}$

The variable Jk is called the "action" of the generalized coordinate qk; the corresponding canonical variable conjugate to Jk is its "angle" wk, for reasons described more fully under action-angle coordinates. The integration is only over a single variable qk and, therefore, unlike the integrated dot product in the abbreviated action integral above. The Jk variable equals the change in Sk(qk) as qk is varied around the closed path. For several physical systems of interest, Jk is either a constant or varies very slowly; hence, the variable Jk is often used in perturbation calculations and in determining adiabatic invariants.

## Euler–Lagrange equations for the action integral

As noted above, the requirement that the action integral be stationary under small perturbations of the evolution is equivalent to a set of differential equations (called the Euler–Lagrange equations) that may be determined using the calculus of variations. We illustrate this derivation here using only one coordinate, x; the extension to multiple coordinates is straightforward.[12][13]

Adopting Hamilton's principle, we assume that the Lagrangian L (the integrand of the action integral) depends only on the coordinate x(t) and its time derivative dx(t)/dt, and may also depend explicitly on time. In that case, the action integral can be written

$\mathcal{S} = \int_{t_1}^{t_2}\; L(x,\dot{x},t)\,dt$

where the initial and final times (t1 and t2) and the final and initial positions are specified in advance as $x_{1} = x(t_{1})$ and $x_{2} = x(t_{2})$. Let xtrue(t) represent the true evolution that we seek, and let $x_{\mathrm{per}}(t)$ be a slightly perturbed version of it, albeit with the same endpoints, $x_{\mathrm{per}}(t_{1})=x_{1}$ and $x_{\mathrm{per}}(t_{2})=x_{2}$. The difference between these two evolutions, which we will call $\varepsilon(t)$, is infinitesimally small at all times

$\varepsilon(t) = x_{\mathrm{per}}(t) - x_{\mathrm{true}}(t)$

At the endpoints, the difference vanishes, i.e., $\varepsilon(t_{1}) = \varepsilon(t_{2}) = 0$.

Expanded to first order, the difference between the actions integrals for the two evolutions is

\begin{align} \delta \mathcal{S} &= \int_{t_1}^{t_2}\; \left[ L(x_{\mathrm{true}}+\varepsilon,\dot x_{\mathrm{true}} +\dot\varepsilon,t)- L(x_{\mathrm{true}},\dot x_{\mathrm{true}},t) \right]dt \\ &= \int_{t_1}^{t_2}\; \left(\varepsilon{\partial L\over\partial x} + \dot\varepsilon{\partial L\over\partial \dot x} \right)\,dt \end{align}

Integration by parts of the last term, together with the boundary conditions $\varepsilon(t_{1}) = \varepsilon(t_{2}) = 0$, yields the equation

$\delta \mathcal{S} = \int_{t_1}^{t_2}\; \left( \varepsilon{\partial L\over \partial x} - \varepsilon{d\over dt }{\partial L\over\partial \dot x} \right)\,dt.$

The requirement that $\mathcal{S}$ be stationary implies that the first-order change must be zero for any possible perturbation ε(t) about the true evolution,

 Principle of stationary action $\delta\mathcal{S}=0$

This can be true only if

 Euler–Lagrange equation ${\partial L\over\partial x} - {d\over dt }{\partial L\over\partial \dot{x}} = 0$

The Euler–Lagrange equation is obeyed provided the functional derivative of the action integral is identically zero:

$\frac{\delta \mathcal{S}}{\delta x(t)}=0$.

The quantity $\frac{\partial L}{\partial\dot x}$ is called the conjugate momentum for the coordinate x. An important consequence of the Euler–Lagrange equations is that if L does not explicitly contain coordinate x, i.e.

if $\frac{\partial L}{\partial x}=0$, then $\frac{\partial L}{\partial\dot x}$ is constant in time.

In such cases, the coordinate x is called a cyclic coordinate, and its conjugate momentum is conserved.

### Example: free particle in polar coordinates

Simple examples help to appreciate the use of the action principle via the Euler–Lagrangian equations. A free particle (mass m and velocity v) in Euclidean space moves in a straight line. Using the Euler–Lagrange equations, this can be shown in polar coordinates as follows. In the absence of a potential, the Lagrangian is simply equal to the kinetic energy

$\frac{1}{2} mv^2= \frac{1}{2}m \left( \dot{x}^2 + \dot{y}^2 \right)$

in orthonormal (x,y) coordinates, where the dot represents differentiation with respect to the curve parameter (usually the time, t). In polar coordinates (r, φ) the kinetic energy and hence the Lagrangian becomes

$L = \frac{1}{2}m \left( \dot{r}^2 + r^2\dot\varphi^2 \right).$

The radial r and φ components of the Euler–Lagrangian equations become, respectively

\begin{align} \frac{d}{dt} \left( \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{r}} \right) - \frac{\partial L}{\partial r} &= 0 \qquad \Rightarrow \qquad \ddot{r} - r\dot{\varphi}^2 &= 0 \\ \frac{d}{dt} \left( \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{\varphi}} \right) - \frac{\partial L}{\partial \varphi} &= 0 \qquad \Rightarrow \qquad \ddot{\varphi} + \frac{2}{r}\dot{r}\dot{\varphi} &= 0 \end{align}

The solution of these two equations is given by

\begin{align} r\cos\varphi &= a t + b \\ r\sin\varphi &= c t + d \end{align}

for a set of constants a, b, c, d determined by initial conditions. Thus, indeed, the solution is a straight line given in polar coordinates.

## The action principle

### Classical fields

The action principle can be extended to obtain the equations of motion for fields, such as the electromagnetic field or gravitational field.

The Einstein equation utilizes the Einstein-Hilbert action as constrained by a variational principle.

The path of a body in a gravitational field (i.e. free fall in space time, a so called geodesic) can be found using the action principle.

### Conservation laws

Symmetries in a physical situation can better be treated with the action principle, together with the Euler–Lagrange equations, which are derived from the action principle. An example is Noether's theorem, which states that to every continuous symmetry in a physical situation there corresponds a conservation law (and conversely). This deep connection requires that the action principle be assumed. [14]

### Quantum mechanics and quantum field theory

In quantum mechanics, the system does not follow a single path whose action is stationary, but the behavior of the system depends on all permitted paths and the value of their action. The action corresponding to the various paths is used to calculate the path integral, that gives the probability amplitudes of the various outcomes.

Although equivalent in classical mechanics with Newton's laws, the action principle is better suited for generalizations and plays an important role in modern physics. Indeed, this principle is one of the great generalizations in physical science. In particular, it is fully appreciated and best understood within quantum mechanics. Richard Feynman's path integral formulation of quantum mechanics is based on a stationary-action principle, using path integrals. Maxwell's equations can be derived as conditions of stationary action.

### Single relativistic particle

When relativistic effects are significant, the action of a point particle of mass m travelling a world line C parametrized by the proper time $\tau$ is

$S = - m c^2 \int_{C} \, d \tau$.

If instead, the particle is parametrized by the coordinate time t of the particle and the coordinate time ranges from t1 to t2, then the action becomes

$\int_{t1}^{t2} L \, dt$

where the Lagrangian is

$L = - m c^2 \sqrt {1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2}}$.[15]

### Modern extensions

The action principle can be generalized still further. For example, the action need not be an integral because nonlocal actions are possible. The configuration space need not even be a functional space given certain features such as noncommutative geometry. However, a physical basis for these mathematical extensions remains to be established experimentally. [16]

## References

1. ^ McGraw Hill Encyclopaedia of Physics (2nd Edition), C.B. Parker, 1994, ISBN 0-07-051400-3
2. ^ Quantum Mechanics, E. Abers, Pearson Ed., Addison Wesley, Prentice Hall Inc, 2004, ISBN 978-0-13-146100-0
3. ^ Analytical Mechanics, L.N. Hand, J.D. Finch, Cambridge University Press, 2008, ISBN 978-0-521-57572-0
4. ^ Œuvres de Mr de Maupertuis (pre-1801 Imprint Collection at the Library of Congress).
5. ^ Encyclopaedia of Physics (2nd Edition), R.G. Lerner, G.L. Trigg, VHC publishers, 1991, ISBN (Verlagsgesellschaft) 3-527-26954-1, ISBN (VHC Inc.) 0-89573-752-3
6. ^ Analytical Mechanics, L.N. Hand, J.D. Finch, Cambridge University Press, 2008, ISBN 978-0-521-57572-0
7. ^ The Road to Reality, Roger Penrose, Vintage books, 2007, ISBN 0-679-77631-1
8. ^ Analytical Mechanics, L.N. Hand, J.D. Finch, Cambridge University Press, 2008, ISBN 978-0-521-57572-0
9. ^ The Road to Reality, Roger Penrose, Vintage books, 2007, ISBN 0-679-77631-1
10. ^ Classical Mechanics, T.W.B. Kibble, European Physics Series, McGraw-Hill (UK), 1973, ISBN 07-084018-0
11. ^ Analytical Mechanics, L.N. Hand, J.D. Finch, Cambridge University Press, 2008, ISBN 978-0-521-57572-0
12. ^ McGraw Hill Encyclopaedia of Physics (2nd Edition), C.B. Parker, 1994, ISBN 0-07-051400-3
13. ^ Classical Mechanics, T.W.B. Kibble, European Physics Series, McGraw-Hill (UK), 1973, ISBN 07-084018-0
14. ^ Quantum Mechanics, E. Abers, Pearson Ed., Addison Wesley, Prentice Hall Inc, 2004, ISBN 978-0-13-146100-0
15. ^ L.D. Landau and E.M. Lifshitz The Classical Theory of Fields Addison-Wesley 1971 sec 8.p.24-25
16. ^ The Road to Reality, Roger Penrose, Vintage books, 2007, ISBN 0-679-77631-1

For an annotated bibliography, see Edwin F. Taylor [1] who lists, among other things, the following books

• The Cambridge Handbook of Physics Formulas, G. Woan, Cambridge University Press, 2010, ISBN 978-0-521-57507-2.
• Cornelius Lanczos, The Variational Principles of Mechanics (Dover Publications, New York, 1986). ISBN 0-486-65067-7. The reference most quoted by all those who explore this field.
• L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Mechanics, Course of Theoretical Physics (Butterworth-Heinenann, 1976), 3rd ed., Vol. 1. ISBN 0-7506-2896-0. Begins with the principle of least action.
• Thomas A. Moore "Least-Action Principle" in Macmillan Encyclopedia of Physics (Simon & Schuster Macmillan, 1996), Volume 2, ISBN 0-02-897359-3, OCLC 35269891, pages 840 – 842.
• Gerald Jay Sussman and Jack Wisdom, Structure and Interpretation of Classical Mechanics (MIT Press, 2001). Begins with the principle of least action, uses modern mathematical notation, and checks the clarity and consistency of procedures by programming them in computer language.
• Dare A. Wells, Lagrangian Dynamics, Schaum's Outline Series (McGraw-Hill, 1967) ISBN 0-07-069258-0, A 350 page comprehensive "outline" of the subject.
• Robert Weinstock, Calculus of Variations, with Applications to Physics and Engineering (Dover Publications, 1974). ISBN 0-486-63069-2. An oldie but goodie, with the formalism carefully defined before use in physics and engineering.
• Wolfgang Yourgrau and Stanley Mandelstam, Variational Principles in Dynamics and Quantum Theory (Dover Publications, 1979). A nice treatment that does not avoid the philosophical implications of the theory and lauds the Feynman treatment of quantum mechanics that reduces to the principle of least action in the limit of large mass.
• Edwin F. Taylor's page [2]
• Principle of least action interactive Excellent interactive explanation/webpage

sensagent's content

• definitions
• synonyms
• antonyms
• encyclopedia

Dictionary and translator for handheld

New : sensagent is now available on your handheld

sensagent's office

Shortkey or widget. Free.

Windows Shortkey: . Free.

Vista Widget : . Free.

Webmaster Solution

Alexandria

A windows (pop-into) of information (full-content of Sensagent) triggered by double-clicking any word on your webpage. Give contextual explanation and translation from your sites !

Try here  or   get the code

SensagentBox

With a SensagentBox, visitors to your site can access reliable information on over 5 million pages provided by Sensagent.com. Choose the design that fits your site.

WordGame

The English word games are:
○   Anagrams
○   Wildcard, crossword
○   Lettris
○   Boggle.

Lettris

Lettris is a curious tetris-clone game where all the bricks have the same square shape but different content. Each square carries a letter. To make squares disappear and save space for other squares you have to assemble English words (left, right, up, down) from the falling squares.

boggle

Boggle gives you 3 minutes to find as many words (3 letters or more) as you can in a grid of 16 letters. You can also try the grid of 16 letters. Letters must be adjacent and longer words score better. See if you can get into the grid Hall of Fame !

English dictionary
Main references

Most English definitions are provided by WordNet .
English thesaurus is mainly derived from The Integral Dictionary (TID).
English Encyclopedia is licensed by Wikipedia (GNU).

The wordgames anagrams, crossword, Lettris and Boggle are provided by Memodata.
The web service Alexandria is granted from Memodata for the Ebay search.
The SensagentBox are offered by sensAgent.

Translation

Change the target language to find translations.
Tips: browse the semantic fields (see From ideas to words) in two languages to learn more.

last searches on the dictionary :

1966 online visitors

computed in 0.047s

I would like to report:
section :
a spelling or a grammatical mistake
an offensive content(racist, pornographic, injurious, etc.)