Arabic Bulgarian Chinese Croatian Czech Danish Dutch English Estonian Finnish French German Greek Hebrew Hindi Hungarian Icelandic Indonesian Italian Japanese Korean Latvian Lithuanian Malagasy Norwegian Persian Polish Portuguese Romanian Russian Serbian Slovak Slovenian Spanish Swedish Thai Turkish Vietnamese
Arabic Bulgarian Chinese Croatian Czech Danish Dutch English Estonian Finnish French German Greek Hebrew Hindi Hungarian Icelandic Indonesian Italian Japanese Korean Latvian Lithuanian Malagasy Norwegian Persian Polish Portuguese Romanian Russian Serbian Slovak Slovenian Spanish Swedish Thai Turkish Vietnamese

definition - Deposition_(Rogier_van_der_Weyden)

definition of Wikipedia

   Advertizing ▼


Deposition (Rogier van der Weyden)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Deposition from the Cross
ArtistRogier van der Weyden
TypeOil on oak panel
Dimensions7ft. 2in cm × 8ft. 7in cm
LocationMuseo del Prado, Madrid

The Deposition, sometimes called by the usual variant names for the Deposition of Christ (Descent of Christ from the Cross, Descent from the Cross etc) is a panel painting by the Flemish artist Rogier van der Weyden (1399/1400–1464) created c.1435-38, and now in the Prado, Madrid. The work shows the crucified Christ being lowered from the cross, his lifeless body held by Joseph of Arimathea and Nicodemus.



The painting was commissioned by the Greater Guild of Crossbowmen of Louvain—in today's Belgium—and was originally installed in the Chapel of Our Lady Without the Walls.[1][2] The tiny crossbows in the side spandrels of the picture reflect the original patronage.[3] The art historians Dirk De Vos and Lorne Campbell both give an approximate date of 1435 for the painting. De Vos argues that the earliest known copy of Van der Weyden's Deposition, the Edeleheere triptych in Louvain, may have been completed by 1435, certainly before 1443. Therefore Van der Weyden's painting must pre-date it.[1] The painting was exchanged around 1548 for a copy by Michael Coxcie and an organ. The new owner was Mary of Austria,[1] sister of Holy Roman Emperor, Charles V, for whom she governed the Habsburg Netherlands. The painting was initially installed in Mary's castle at Binche, where it was seen by a Spanish courtier, Vicente Alvárez, who in 1551 wrote this description: "It was the best picture in the whole castle and even, I believe, in the whole world, for I have seen in these parts many good paintings but none that equalled this in truth to nature or devoutness. All those who have seen it were of the same opinion."[1]

Alvárez had accompanied the future king of Spain, Philip II. Philip transported the painting to Spain, where it was initially installed in his hunting lodge, El Pardo.[1] On April 15, 1574, the painting was recorded in the inventory of the monastery palace which Philip had founded, San Lorenzo de El Escorial: "A large panel on which is painted the deposition from the cross, with our Lady and eight other figures . . . by the hand of Maestre Rogier, which used to belong to the queen Mary".[4] The painting was transferred from El Escorial to the Museo del Prado in 1939.[5]

Narrative of the Deposition

In their accounts of the descent of Christ's body from the Cross, the evangelists relate the story only in connection with the Entombment of Christ. According to Matthew (27:57-60), Mark (15:42-47) and Luke (23:50-56), Joseph of Arimathea took Christ’s body and prepared it for burial. John (19:38-42) adds one assistant, Nicodemus. None of these accounts mention Mary at all.

During the middle ages, the narrative of the Passion became more elaborate, and more attention was paid to the role of Christ's mother. One example is the anonymous 14th century text, Meditationes de Vita Christi, perhaps by Ludolph of Saxony. Barbara Lane has suggested that this passage from the Vita Christi might lie behind many painted accounts of the Deposition,[6] including Rogier's:

Then the lady reverently receives the hanging right hand and places it against her cheek gazes upon it, and kisses it with heavy tears and sorrowful sighs.

Structure of the painting

Lorne Campbell has identified the figures in the painting as (from left to right): Mary Cleophas (half-sister to the Virgin Mary); Saint John the Evangelist; Mary Salome (in green, another half-sister of the Virgin Mary); The Virgin Mary (swooning); the body of Jesus Christ; Nicodemus (in red); the young man on the ladder is either a servant of Nicodemus or of Joseph of Arimathea; Joseph of Arimathea (in field-of-cloth-of-gold robes, the most sumptuous costume in the painting); the bearded man behind Joseph holding a jar is probably another servant (The jar that he holds is likely to be the emblem of the Magdalen, containing the ‘pound of ointment of spikenard, very costly’, with which she anointed the feet of Jesus.); and Mary Magdalen who adopts a dramatic pose on the right of the painting.[7]

There is disagreement between art historians as to the representation of Joseph of Arimathea and Nicodemus. In his Rogier van der Weyden: the Complete Works, Dirk de Vos identifies Joseph of Arimathea as the man in red supporting Christ's body, and Nicodemus as the sumptuously dressed man supporting Christ's legs, the opposite of Campbell's identification.[8]

Formal qualities and emotional impact

What makes this work particularly unique for the period is the swoon of the Virgin Mary, collapsing in a pose that mirrors that of her son, right down to the two figures that also hold her as she falls. This pose was entirely new for Early Netherlandish art and was the product of van der Weyden's inventive mind.[9] The sentiment, however, is a direct reflection of the mystical devotion expressed by Thomas à Kempis' popular treatise Imitatio Christi, first published in 1418. The text, just as the image here, invites the reader or viewer to personally identify with the suffering of Christ and Mary. The doctrines of Denis the Carthusian also emphasized the significance of the Virgin Mary and her belief in Christ at the moment of his death. Denis expresses the conviction that the Virgin Mary was near death when Christ gave up his spirit; Van der Weyden's painting conveys this image powerfully.[10]

File:Rogier van der Weyden- Deposition - Mourning Woman; detail.JPG
Detail, Woman Weeping

The shape of the crossbow is present in the way Christ's body is displayed, reflecting the patronage of the Greater Guild of Crossbowmen.[11] Powell argues that in medieval theology, a metaphor would compare Christ on the cross to a taut crossbow: "[this] bow consists of a piece of wood or horn and a string, which represents our Saviour. The string can represent his most holy body,which was miraculously strained and stretched in the suffering of his Passion."[12] The fourteenth century poet, Heinrich von Neustadt, wrote: "He was laid out on the cross:/There were his pure limbs/and his arms drawn/Like the string of a bow." In Rogier’s Deposition, Christ’s removal from the cross is pictured as the relaxation of a bow that has released its arrow.[13]

Dirk de Vos suggests that the artist wished to evoke a gigantic, carved altarpiece with polychrome figures, and that here he is pushing painting forward as a rival to sculpture. The corners are filled with carved tracery, also gilded, and the presentation of living figures on a stage is really a tableau vivant, which in turn imitates a sculptural group. There is a sense of condensed movement in a single instant. Mary faints but is already confirmed in her swoon by St John who rushes to her assistance. The man on the ladder lowers the body but it is already held by Joseph of Arimathea, and Nicodemus who wants to carry it away to the right. Nicodemus’s movement transforms the weeping Magdalene into a statue frozen in time. De Vos writes: “Time seems to have solidified into a composition. And what a composition. Interplay of undulating lines, swaying poses and counterposes of figures have rightly been compared to technique of counterpoint in polyphonic music.”[14]

De Vos also analyses the spatial complexity of the painting. The action takes place in a space barely a shoulder-width deep, yet there are no fewer than five levels of depth within the painting: the Virgin Mary at the front, the body of Christ, the bearded figure of Joseph of Arimathea, the cross and the assistant on his ladder. At the "back" of the painting, the assistant breaks the spatial illusion, by allowing one of the two nails he holds to protrude in front of the painted niche.[15]

The image can be read as a petrified synthesis of all the stages during and after the Descent from the Cross: the lowering of the corpse, the Deposition, the Lamentation and the Entombment. Christ’s feet appear still nailed together, while the spread of His arms retains the position of His body on the Cross. The whole of Christ’s body is shown as if held out for the concentrated gaze of the viewer. Joseph of Arimathea looks across the body towards the skull of Adam. Joseph appears as a sumptuously dressed burgher and has the most portrait-like appearance of the figures in the painting; his gaze links the hands of Christ and his mother, the new Adam and Eve, with the skull of Adam. Thereby visualising the essence of the Redemption.[16]

Campbell argues that the key to the work is not naturalism in the detail of the painting, but rather the use of distortion to induce a sense of unease in the viewer. By including completely irrational details and by distorting otherwise extremely faithful images of reality, the artist shocks us into reconsidering our attitudes to his subjects. Campbell suggests that, in certain ways, Rogier has more in common with Matisse or the Picasso of Guernica than with his contemporaries.[7]

An example of the extraordinary play with the illusion of space in this painting can be seen in the young man at the top of the ladder holding the nails withdrawn from Christ's body. Campbell points out that this servant behind the cross appears to have caught his sleeve in the wooden tracery depicted at the top of the painting. The head of one of the bloody nails that he holds is in front of the fictional wooden picture frame, though the point of the other nail is behind the tracery.[7]

Campbell argues that, in order to prevent these spatial distortion from becoming too obvious, Rogier has taken pains to conceal the principal pictorial junctions in the picture. For example, the ladder is in an impossible perspective: its top is behind the cross while its foot appears to be in front of the cross. To conceal the points at which the Cross and the ladder meet the landscape, Rogier has greatly lengthened the Virgin’s left leg, so that her left foot and mantle cover the base of the Cross and one upright of the ladder.[7]

Later influence

Since its creation, this work has been often copied and was extremely influential; within van der Weyden's own lifetime it was considered an important and unique work of art.[17] Von Simson claims that "no other painting of its school has been copied or adapted so often".[18] In 1565, the Antwerp publisher Hieronymus Cock published an engraving by Cornelis Cort, the first graphic reproduction of Rogier’s Deposition, which is inscribed with the words ‘M. Rogerij Belgiae inuentum’. Cock’s engraving is the earliest record of Rogier’s name in association with the Deposition.[19]

Google Earth

In January 2009, Google Earth and the Prado unveiled a collaborative project which rendered twelve of the Prado's masterpieces visible on Google Earth at extremely high levels of digital resolution. The Google Earth images have a resolution of 14,000 megapixels, some 1,400 times greater than a picture taken on a standard 10 megapixel camera. These pictures were sewn together digitally from more than 8,000 high-resolution photographs of sections of the paintings. One of the twelve paintings featured was Van der Weyden's Descent from the Cross.[20]

The announcement of the launch of this digital art gallery led to discussion of the authenticitity of works of art in museums and galleries. In The Guardian, Jonathan Jones argued that this virtual gallery was the latest instance of the erosion of the "aura" of art, the magic sense of uniqueness that associates a painting and a place and creates the myth of the masterpiece, described by Walter Benjamin in his influential essay The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction.[21]


  1. ^ a b c d e De Vos, 1999, Rogier van der Weyden: The Complete Works, pp. 185-186.
  2. ^ "Descent from the Cross, Prado website".
  3. ^ Snyder, Northern Renaissance, 118.
  4. ^ Powell,(2006) The Errant Image: Rogier van der Weyden's Deposition from the Cross and its Copies, p.552
  5. ^ Museo del Prado, Catálogo de las pinturas, 1996, p. 448, Ministerio de Educación y Cultura, Madrid, ISBN 8487317537
  6. ^ Lane, Altars and Altarpieces, p. 89
  7. ^ a b c d Lorne Campbell, "The New Pictorial Language of Rogier van der Weyden", in Rogier van der Weyden, Master of Passions, ed. Campbell & Van der Stock, 2009, pp.32-64
  8. ^ De Vos, 1999, Rogier van der Weyden: The Complete Works, p. 21.
  9. ^ Snyder, 118
  10. ^ von Simson, "Compassio and Co-redemptio," 14-15.
  11. ^ Powell,(2006) The Errant Image: Rogier van der Weyden's Deposition from the Cross and its Copies, p.544
  12. ^ Gottfried von Admont, ‘Arcus, qui ex ligno et chorda, vel cornu et chorda constat, eumdem Dominum ac Redemptoremnostrum nobiliter demonstrat. Potest enim designari per chordam sanctissima ejus caro, diversis tribulationum angustiis mirabiliter attracta atque distenta’. Patrologia Latina: The Full-Text Database, Alexandria, 1996, vol. 174, 1150A-B. Quoted and discussed in Frederick P. Pickering, Das gotische Christusbild: Zu den Quellen mittelalterlicher Passionsdarstellungen, Euphorion: Zeitschrift fur Literaturgeschichte, 47, 1953, 31–2.
  13. ^ Powell,(2006) The Errant Image: Rogier van der Weyden's Deposition from the Cross and its Copies, p.545
  14. ^ De Vos, 1999, Rogier van der Weyden: The Complete Works, pp. 14–16.
  15. ^ De Vos, 1999 Rogier van der Weyden: The Complete Works, p. 15.
  16. ^ De Vos, 1999, Rogier van der Weyden: The Complete Works, p. 22.
  17. ^ von Simson, "Compassio and Co-redemptio," 9-10.
  18. ^ von Simson, "Compassio and Co-redemptio," 9.
  19. ^ Powell,(2006) The Errant Image: Rogier van der Weyden's Deposition from the Cross and its Copies, p.550
  20. ^ Tremlett, Giles (2009-01-13). "Google brings masterpieces from Prado direct to armchair art lovers". The Guardian. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/jan/13/spain-art. Retrieved 2009-09-02. 
  21. ^ Jones, Jonathan (2009-01-13). "Google Earth's Prado can't compete with the real thing". The Guardian. http://dir.salon.com/story/books/review/2004/10/08/dylan/index.html?pn=1. Retrieved 2009-09-02. 


  • Campbell, Lorne & Van der Stock, Jan, Rogier van der Weyden: 1400-1464. Master of Passions, Davidsfonds, Leuven, 2009, ISBN 978-90-8526-105-6.
  • De Vos, Dirk. Rogier Van Der Weyden: The Complete Works. Harry N. Abrams, 1999. ISBN 0-8109-6390-6
  • Lane, Barbara. The altar and the altarpiece: sacramental themes in early Netherlandish painting. Harper & Row, 1984. ISBN 0064350002
  • Powell, Amy. The Errant Image: Rogier van der Weyden's Deposition from the Cross and its Copies, in Art History, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp 540-552
  • von Simson, Otto G., " Compassio and Co-redemptio in Roger van der Weyden's Descent from the Cross," in The Art Bulletin, Vol. 35, No. 1 (Mar., 1953), pp. 9-16.
  • Snyder, James, Northern Renaissance Art; Painting, Sculpture, The Graphic Arts from 1350 to 1575, Second Edition (Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2005).


All translations of Deposition_(Rogier_van_der_Weyden)

sensagent's content

  • definitions
  • synonyms
  • antonyms
  • encyclopedia

Dictionary and translator for handheld

⇨ New : sensagent is now available on your handheld

   Advertising ▼

sensagent's office

Shortkey or widget. Free.

Windows Shortkey: sensagent. Free.

Vista Widget : sensagent. Free.

Webmaster Solution


A windows (pop-into) of information (full-content of Sensagent) triggered by double-clicking any word on your webpage. Give contextual explanation and translation from your sites !

Try here  or   get the code


With a SensagentBox, visitors to your site can access reliable information on over 5 million pages provided by Sensagent.com. Choose the design that fits your site.

Business solution

Improve your site content

Add new content to your site from Sensagent by XML.

Crawl products or adds

Get XML access to reach the best products.

Index images and define metadata

Get XML access to fix the meaning of your metadata.

Please, email us to describe your idea.


The English word games are:
○   Anagrams
○   Wildcard, crossword
○   Lettris
○   Boggle.


Lettris is a curious tetris-clone game where all the bricks have the same square shape but different content. Each square carries a letter. To make squares disappear and save space for other squares you have to assemble English words (left, right, up, down) from the falling squares.


Boggle gives you 3 minutes to find as many words (3 letters or more) as you can in a grid of 16 letters. You can also try the grid of 16 letters. Letters must be adjacent and longer words score better. See if you can get into the grid Hall of Fame !

English dictionary
Main references

Most English definitions are provided by WordNet .
English thesaurus is mainly derived from The Integral Dictionary (TID).
English Encyclopedia is licensed by Wikipedia (GNU).


The wordgames anagrams, crossword, Lettris and Boggle are provided by Memodata.
The web service Alexandria is granted from Memodata for the Ebay search.
The SensagentBox are offered by sensAgent.


Change the target language to find translations.
Tips: browse the semantic fields (see From ideas to words) in two languages to learn more.

last searches on the dictionary :

2778 online visitors

computed in 0.187s

I would like to report:
section :
a spelling or a grammatical mistake
an offensive content(racist, pornographic, injurious, etc.)
a copyright violation
an error
a missing statement
please precise:



Company informations

My account



   Advertising ▼