Arabic Bulgarian Chinese Croatian Czech Danish Dutch English Estonian Finnish French German Greek Hebrew Hindi Hungarian Icelandic Indonesian Italian Japanese Korean Latvian Lithuanian Malagasy Norwegian Persian Polish Portuguese Romanian Russian Serbian Slovak Slovenian Spanish Swedish Thai Turkish Vietnamese
Arabic Bulgarian Chinese Croatian Czech Danish Dutch English Estonian Finnish French German Greek Hebrew Hindi Hungarian Icelandic Indonesian Italian Japanese Korean Latvian Lithuanian Malagasy Norwegian Persian Polish Portuguese Romanian Russian Serbian Slovak Slovenian Spanish Swedish Thai Turkish Vietnamese

definition - Finnish verb conjugation

definition of Wikipedia

   Advertizing ▼


Finnish verb conjugation


Verbs in the Finnish language are usually divided into six main groups when teaching the language to non-native speakers depending on the stem type. All six types have the same set of endings, but the stems undergo (slightly) different changes when inflected.

Please refer to the Finnish language grammar article for more about verbs and other aspects of Finnish grammar.


  Tables of conjugation

Tables of conjugation are given here for the regular verb (of type I,) 'puhua', to speak.

  Basic tenses in the indicative mood

indicative mood
active voice present tense imperfect perfect pluperfect
per. no. pron. affirmative negative affirmative negative affirmative negative affirmative negative
1st sg. minä puhun en puhu puhuin en puhunut olen puhunut en ole puhunut olin puhunut en ollut puhunut
2nd sinä puhut et puhu puhuit et puhunut olet puhunut et ole puhunut olit puhunut et ollut puhunut
3rd hän puhuu ei puhu puhui ei puhunut on puhunut ei ole puhunut oli puhunut ei ollut puhunut
1st pl. me puhumme emme puhu puhuimme emme puhuneet olemme puhuneet emme ole puhuneet olimme puhuneet emme olleet puhuneet
2nd te puhutte ette puhu puhuitte ette puhuneet olette puhuneet ette ole puhuneet olitte puhuneet ette olleet puhuneet
3rd he puhuvat eivät puhu puhuivat eivät puhuneet ovat puhuneet eivät ole puhuneet olivat puhuneet eivät olleet puhuneet
passive voice puhutaan ei puhuta puhuttiin ei puhuttu on puhuttu ei ole puhuttu oli puhuttu ei oltu puhuttu

ei ollut puhuttu

The present, imperfect, perfect, and pluperfect correspond fairly well to English: "speaks", "spoke", "has spoken", and "had spoken", resp., or in the passive voice, "it is spoken", "it was spoken", "it has been spoken", and "it had been spoken". Note the helping verb 'ei' used for negation, usually with the naked stem of the main verb, but with the past participle in the negative imperfect. Finnish lacks a true future tense, so normally the present tense must suffice for future time as well.

  Conditional and potential mood

conditional mood potential mood
active voice present tense perfect present tense perfect
per. no. pron. affirmative negative affirmative negative affirmative negative affirmative negative
1st sg. minä puhuisin en puhuisi olisin puhunut en olisi puhunut puhunen en puhune lienen puhunut en liene puhunut
2nd sinä puhuisit et puhuisi olisit puhunut et olisi puhunut puhunet et puhune lienet puhunut et liene puhunut
3rd hän puhuisi ei puhuisi olisi puhunut ei olisi puhunut puhunee ei puhune lienee puhunut ei liene puhunut
1st pl. me puhuisimme emme puhuisi olisimme puhuneet emme olisi puhuneet puhunemme emme puhune lienemme puhuneet emme liene puhuneet
2nd te puhuisitte ette puhuisi olisitte puhuneet ette olisi puhuneet puhunette ette puhune lienette puhuneet ette liene puhuneet
3rd he puhuisivat eivät puhuisi olisivat puhuneet eivät olisi puhuneet puhunevat eivät puhune lienevät puhuneet eivät liene puhuneet
passive voice puhuttaisiin ei puhuttaisi olisi puhuttu ei olisi puhuttu puhuttaneen ei puhuttane lienee puhuttu ei liene puhuttu

The conditional mood corresponds mostly to "would" or "should" or to the past subjunctive in English. (Finnish lacks a subjunctive mood.) The potential mood is rather rare, and corresponds to "may" or "might" in English. The perfect forms of these moods are easily understood as "would've", "should've", "might've", etc.

  Imperative mood and miscellaneous tenses

imperative mood indicative mood
active voice present tense perfect present prospective imperfect prospective
per. no. pron. affirmative negative affirmative negative affirmative negative affirmative negative
1st sg. minä olen puhuva en ole puhuva olin puhuva en ollut puhuva
2nd sinä puhu älä puhu ole puhunut älä ole puhunut olet puhuva et ole puhuva olit puhuva et ollut puhuva
3rd hän puhukoon älköön puhuko olkoon puhunut älköön olko puhunut on puhuva ei ole puhuva oli puhuva ei ollut puhuva
1st pl. me puhukaamme älkäämme puhuko olkaamme puhuneet älkäämme olko puhuneet
2nd te puhukaa älkää puhuko olkaa puhuneet älkää olko puhuneet
3rd he puhukoot älkööt puhuko olkoot puhuneet älkööt olko puhuneet
passive voice puhuttakoon ei puhuttako

älköön puhuttako
olkoon puhuttu älköön olko puhuttu on puhuttava ei ole puhuttava oli puhuttava ei ollut puhuttava

The first and third person imperative forms here correspond to English "let us speak", "let him not speak", "let it not be spoken", etc. The perfect imperative is still valid, if somewhat awkward and contrived, e.g. as in English "let it (not) have been spoken". The first person plural imperative 'puhukaamme' sounds rather formal and archaic, so in everyday speech, the passive present indicative 'puhutaan', is used instead, although this may not quite be considered correct. There are many variations of the imperative forms: in old writings, one may also see the forms 'puhukaat' or 'puhukaatte' for the second person plural, 'puhukaan' for the third person plural, or 'puhuttakaan' for the passive. In the passive or third person, the imperative is sometimes used for the present or perfect subjunctive of other languages, a mood which is lacking in Finnish.

The present prospective and the imperfect prospective correspond best to "I am to speak" and "I was to speak" in English. It is not correct Finnish to use these tenses in the plural: the plural form of the present participle, 'puhuvat', would be confusing if used in this sense, as it resembles too closely the third person plural present indicative. Despite the apparently equivalent use of the present participle, the grammatical aspect of these tenses is prospective rather than continuous or progressive as in English.

  Verbs of obligation in the agent construction

Verbs of obligation such as 'täytyä', 'tarvita', 'pitää', and 'tulla', with the meanings "must", "need to", "ought to", "shall", respectively are often used in the agent form of construction in which the verb is not conjugated for person but is in the impersonal third person singular. In this construction

  • the person(s) bearing the obligation is regarded as the 'agent' (not the subject) and is in the genitive case
  • the verb of obligation is in the passive third person singular regardless of the plurality and person of the agent.
  • This is followed by another verb or verb phrase in which the verb is in the short from first infinitive (i.e. the dictionary form) and which is then regarded as the sentence's subject.[1]
Heidän täytyy puhua minun kanssani = They must speak with me;
Minun täytyy puhua heidän kanssansa = I must speak with them;
Sinun ei tarvitse tehdä tuota = you don't need to do that;
Ei sinun pidä tappaman = thou shalt not kill.[2]
sinun pitäisi tulla huomenna = you should come tomorrow.

There is no equivalent of this type of construction in English.

The verb 'täytyä' can only be used in this construction and therefore has no other personal forms. The other verbs can carry personal endings in other forms of construction with normal subject, verb, and object in which the obligation is less strong or in which the verb takes on a different meaning altogether.

  • (Minä) tarvitsen apua I need help -- expressing need without obligation
  • (Minä) pidän hänestä I like him/her -- verb has a different meaning

  Infinitives and participles

In Finnish there are five infinitives,[3] and past and present participles for both active and passive voices.[4]

  Infinitive I

This is the dictionary form of the verb, e.g. 'puhua', and it fully carries the meaning of the English particle "to" that often precedes infinitives. Its suffix is most often -ta/-tä, although -da/-dä is found, and consonant gradation is applied (e.g. karata "to run away" < karkaa-). It can be used in a sentence similarly to the English infinitive, standing for a subject or a direct object, without any additional inflection. It is also governed by verbs like saattaa "might" or voida "be able to", e.g. saattaa mennä "might go" or voi hakea "can be fetched".

Infinitive I also has a so-called "long form", having the ending of the translative case plus an obligatory possessive suffix. The long form is rather archaic, and connotes either extent or intent. Examples:

'muistaa' = "to remember"; 'muistaakseni' = "as far as I can remember" (extent), or "for my remembering", or "in order that I might remember" (intent)
'nähdä' = "to see"; 'nähdäkseen' = "as far as he/she/it/they can see" (extent), "so that they could see" (intent)

In modern Finnish, intent is usually expressed with the short form of this infinitive if the subject is implicit or understood by context, or more explicitly with the conditional, e.g. 'että minä muistaisin'. Nevertheless, the long form is still used to signify extent, for another example, 'tietääkseni', "as far as I know".

The first infinitive does not generally take on any inflected forms except for the short (dictionary) form and the long form, nor can the long form exist without a possessive suffix.

  Infinitive II

This infinitive is usually formed from the first infinitive by replacing the final 'a/ä' with an 'e'. It occurs in the instructive and inessive cases. If the second infinitive has a subject, then the subject is put in the genitive case; in the inessive case the second infinitive also accepts a possessive suffix if appropriate.

The instructive form conveys manner of action, corresponding approximately with "-ing" or "-ingly" in English, less commonly with "-ande/ende" in Swedish, and very commonly with "-ant" in French: Examples:

'tietäen' = "knowingly" (instructive);
'tietäen, että hänen täytyisi puhua' = "knowing that he would have to speak" = "sachant qu'il aurait besoin de parler" in French
'näin puhuen' = "thus speaking" (instructive);

The inessive form conveys co-terminal action; i.e. something happening at the same time as something else; more properly seen as some action whose accomplishment simultaneously brings about the accomplishment of something else. It corresponds approximately in English to the use of "when", "while", or the somewhat archaic or British) "whilst"; strict co-terminality is still expressed in English with "in", (or "by",) the present participle "-ing", and any subject in the possessive case, in a manner exactly analogous to the Finnish, and similarly in French with "en" and the present participle "-ant". Examples

'kuollessa' = "in dying" or "while dying" or "en mourant" in French (inessive).
'Varas iski uhrin syödessä aamupalaa'= The thief struck whilst the victim was eating breakfast

The inessive of this infinitive also has a passive form:

'tiedettäessä' = "in being known", said of some fact;

but this is ambiguous and could be taken for the active inessive infinitive II of the causative 'tiedettää', "to make (someone) know"

'tiedettäessä' = "in making (someone) know" or "in making (some fact) known".

  Infinitive III

The third infinitive is formed by adding the ending '-ma/mä' to the hard grade of the present stem, (described below.) It is a noun in its own right, denoting "the act" of a verb, and thus it is fully declineable as a noun, but some of the cases have special or commonly understood meanings. The illative of the third infinitive is a common inchoative, governed by such verbs as 'ruveta' and 'joutua':

'hän rupesi saarnaamaan' = "he began to preach".

The elative is used in the sense of forbidding or discouraging an action.

'poikia kiellettiin polttamasta' = "the boys were forbidden from smoking"

The adessive (often with a possessive suffix) is used in the sense of being "just about to" do something, equivalent to the French expression "sur le point de (faire quelque chose)".

  Infinitive IV

The fourth infinitive is formed just like the third, but with the ending '-minen', which is declined like all other Finnish nouns in '-nen'. It is also a noun, but its meaning is more "the process" rather than the very act of a verb. This often corresponds to "-ation" words in English:

'käyminen' = "(the process of) going", which can mean "fermentation" among other things.

The use of this form as a proper infinitive, rather than an "action noun" is generally restricted to forms such as the following, where it implies a sort of obligation:

'minun on tekeminen jotakin' = "it is up to me to do something"
'on tekeminen jotakin' = "something ought to be done"
'heidän ei ole kysymistä ...' = "theirs is not to ask ..."
'tästä ei ole puhumista' = "this is not to be spoken of";

or this construction, where the finite verb is repeated in the partitive with a possessive suffix:

'hän puhui puhumistaan' = "he talked and talked".

  Infinitive V

The rarely used fifth infinitive is a "diminutive" of the third infinitive. It is apparently used only in the adessive plural with a possessive suffix, indicating that at some point in time the action of the verb is "but little" accomplished:

'olin puhumaisillani' = "I was just starting to speak".

  Present participles


The active present participle is formed by adding '-va/vä' to the hard grade of the present indicative stem of the verb.

'tulevat päivät ovat tuulisia' = "the coming days are (going to be) windy"

(In the nominative plural this form nearly always coincides with the third person plural present indicative.)


There is also a passive present participle formed by adding the same ending to the passive stem.

'puhuttava' = "to be spoken of"

This form is also ambiguous: it could equally well be the active present participle of the causative 'puhuttaa', "to cause (someone) to speak", thus:

'puhuttava' = (active) "making (someone) speak"
'puhutettava' = (passive) "being made to speak"

  Past participles


The active past participle is usually formed by adding '-nut/nyt' to the short stem, omitting any epenthetic vowel. Verbs of type III (ending in '-lla/llä', '-rra/rrä', and '-sta/stä') assimilate the 'n' of this ending, thus:

'tullut' = "(one that has) come";
'purrut' = "(one that has) bitten";
'pessyt' = "(one that has) washed".

The stem of the active past participle, for all other cases but the nominative singular, ends in '-nee-', which may be likewise assimilated. See tables of conjugation.


The passive past participle has the ending '-tu/ty' or '-ttu/tty' to the soft grade of the stem. For a verb of type I, a final '-a/ä-' of the stem is replaced by '-e-' for the passive past participle.

'antaa' = "to give"; 'annettu' = "(that has been) given".

The passive past participle is subject to consonant gradation:

tt\rightarrow t\rightarrow d;

and for verbs of type III:

lt\rightarrow ll,\quad nt\rightarrow nn,\quad rt\rightarrow rr,\quad st\rightarrow st.
'annettu' = (that has been) given; 'annetut' = "(that have been) given", (pl.);
'purtu' "(one that has been) bitten", graded as 'purru-', e.g. 'purrun' "of that which has been bitten".
'pesty' = "(that has been) washed", unchanged in soft grade, e.g. 'pestyt hiukset' = "hair that has been washed" (pl. of 'hius', "a single hair").
  Derived passive forms

Without exception, all other passive forms of the verb may be derived from the passive past participle in a regular manner, by replacing the final '-u/y' with the following endings:

  • in the hard grade:
    • '-iin': passive imperfect; annettiin "was given"
    • '-ava':: passive present participle; annettava "that which is (to be) given"
    • '-aisiin/äisiin': passive conditional; annettaisiin "would be given"
    • '-aisi/äisi': passive conditional connegative with negative verb ei; ei annettaisi "would not be given"
    • '-aneen/äneen': passive potential; annettaneen "might be given"
    • '-ane/äne': passive potential connegative; ei annettane "might not be given"
    • '-akoon/äköön', '-akaan/äkään': passive imperative; annettakoon "shall be given"
    • '-ako/äkö': passive imperative connegative; ei annettako "shall not be given"
  • in the soft grade:
    • '-aan/ään': passive present indicative; annetaan "is given"
    • '-a/ä': passive present indicative connegative with negative verb ei; ei anneta "is not given".

  Overview of main verb types

The following table shows the basic changes and marks for conjugating each of the types of Finnish verbs.

Type Example 1. Pers. Pres. 3. Pers. Imp. Participle Passive Passive Imp. Infinitive ends in Translation
1a puhua puhun puhui puhunut puhutaan puhuttiin -oa, -ua/yä to speak
1b oppia opin oppi oppinut opitaan opittiin -ea/eä, -ia/iä to learn
1c antaa annan antoi antanut annetaan annettiin -aa, 1. vowel a/e/i to give
1d johtaa johdan johti johtanut johdetaan johdettiin -aa, 1. vowel o/u to lead
1e kieltää kiellän kielsi kieltänyt kielletään kiellettiin -ää to forbid
2a saada saan sai saanut saadaan saatiin (long vowel)+da/dä to get
2b syödä syön söi syönyt syödään syötiin (diphthong)+da/dä to eat
3 tulla tulen tuli tullut tullaan tultiin -lla/llä, -nna/nnä,
-rra/rrä, -sta/stä
to come
4 haluta haluan halusi halunnut halutaan haluttiin -uta/ytä to want
5 tarvita tarvitsen tarvitsi tarvinnut tarvitaan tarvittiin -ita/itä to need
6 paeta pakenen pakeni paennut paetaan paettiin -eta/etä to flee
7 pilkata pilkkaan pilkkasi pilkannut pilkataan pilkattiin -ata/ätä to mock

  Type I verbs

These are verbs whose infinitive forms end in vowel + 'a' (or 'ä' for front-vowel containing stems), for example 'puhua' = 'to speak', 'tietää' = 'to know'. This group contains a very large number of verbs. Here is how 'tietää' conjugates in the present indicative:

minä tiedän = I know
sinä tiedät = you (singular) know
hän/se tietää = (s)he/it knows
me tiedämme = we know
te tiedätte = you (plural/formal) know
he/ne tietävät = they know

The personal endings are thus -n, -t, -(doubled vowel), -mme, -tte, -vat. The inflecting stem is formed by dropping the final '-a', and has a strong consonant in the third-person forms and weak otherwise. Note that for third person plural, this is an exception to the general rule for strong consonants.

  Past Tense

In the simple case (which applies to most type I verbs), the imperfect indicative is formed by inserting the characteristic 'i' between the stem and the personal endings, which are the same as in the present tense except that the vowel does not double in the 3rd person singular:

'puhun' = 'I speak', 'puhuin' = 'I spoke'
'puhut' = 'you speak', 'puhuit' = 'you spoke'
'puhuu' = '(he) speaks', 'puhui' = '(he) spoke'
'puhumme' = 'we speak', 'puhuimme' = 'we spoke' and so on.

However, the insertion of the 'i' often has an effect on the stem. Of type I verbs, one notable exception is 'tietää':

'tiedän' = 'I know', 'tiesin' = 'I knew'

'ymmärtää' = 'to understand' also follows this pattern. Changes of stem for other verb types will be discussed in the relevant sections below.


Present passive
The present passive is formed by adding '-taan' to the inflecting stem of the verb with the consonant in its weak form:
puhua -> puhu- -> puhutaan
If the vowel at the end of the stem is 'a' or 'ä' it is changed to 'e' before the '-taan' ending:
tietää -> tiedä- -> tiede -> tiedetään
Past passive
This is formed in the same way as the present passive, except that the ending is '-ttiin', hence 'puhuttiin' = 'it was spoken', 'tiedettiin' = 'it was known'.
Note the presence of the same 'i' marker in the past passive as in the imperfect indicative. Note also the presence of the extra 't'.
Conditional passive
This is formed in the same way as the present passive, except that the ending is '-ttaisiin', hence 'puhuttaisiin' = 'it would be spoken', 'tiedettäisiin' = 'it would be known'.
Note the presence of the 'isi' conditional marker.
Potential passive
This is formed in the same way as the present passive, except that the ending is '-ttaneen', hence 'puhuttaneen' = 'it may be spoken', 'tiedettäneen' = 'it may be known'.
Note the presence of the 'ne' potential marker.

  Type II verbs

These are verbs whose infinitive forms end in two consonants + 'a', for example 'mennä' = 'to go'. This is another large group of verbs.

  Present indicative

The stem is formed by removing the 'a' and its preceding consonant. Then add 'e' followed by the personal endings: menen, menet, menee, menemme, menette, menevät.

  Imperfect indicative

The 'i' of the imperfect is added directly to the stem formed as for the present tense, then the personal endings are added: 'pestä' = 'to clean', 'pesen' = 'I clean', 'pesin' = 'I cleaned' etc.


Present passive
In this group, the passive has the same '-aan' ending as for group I verbs, but no 't'; the easiest way to form the passive is to extend the vowel on the end of the first infinitive and then add 'n':
mennä -> mennään

All other forms of the passive are related to the present passive in the same way as for type I verbs, including the 'extra t', except that since there was no 't' to start with, the passive forms only have one! Also the double consonant before the ending becomes single.

mennä -> mennään -> mentiin, mentäisiin
olla -> ollaan -> oltiin (see below), oltaisiin

  Type III verbs

Verbs whose infinitives end in vowel + 'da', for example 'juoda' = 'to drink', 'syödä' = 'to eat'. This is a fairly large group of verbs, partly because one way in which foreign borrowings are incorporated into the Finnish verb paradigms is to add 'oida', for example, 'organisoida' = 'to organise'.

Another important verb of this type is 'voida' = 'to be able/allowed to'.

The stem is formed by removing 'da' with no vowel doubling in the third person singular: juon, juot, juo, juomme, juotte, juovat.

  Imperfect indicative

For these verbs whose stems end in two vowels, the first of the vowels is lost when the 'i' is added in the imperfect: 'juon = 'I drink', 'join' = 'I drank' etc.

There is an exception to this rule if the stem already ends in an 'i' - for example 'voida' or the '-oida' verbs mentioned earlier. In this case the stem does not change between present and imperfect indicative, so the imperfect forms are the same as the present forms, and the distinction between them must be made from context.


Passives in this group are formed in the same way as for group II verbs:

syödä -> syödään, syötiin, syötäisiin
juoda -> juodaan, juotiin, juotaisiin

  Type IV verbs

This, and the following two groups, have infinitives ending in vowel + 'ta'. Most commonly, type IV verbs end with 'ata', 'ota', 'uta', but the other two vowels are possible. Examples are 'tavata' = 'to meet', 'haluta' = 'to want', 'tarjota' = 'to offer'.

The inflecting stem is formed by dropping the 'a' changing the final consonant into its strong form:

haluta -> halut-
tavata -> tavat-
tarjota -> tarjot-

In the present indicative, the final 't' mutates into an 'a' . After this, the personal ending is added (or the vowel doubled in the 3rd person singular) as usual:

haluan, haluat, haluaa, haluamme, haluatte, haluavat
tapaan, tapaat, tapaa etc.
tarjoan, tarjoat, tarjoaa etc.

  Imperfect indicative

The same stem is used as for the present except that the final 't' becomes 's' rather than 'a'. This is followed by the imperfect 'i' marker and the personal endings: 'halusin' = 'I wanted', 'tapasimme' = 'we met' etc.


Passives in this group are formed in the same way as for type II verbs, except that since the present passives will all have a 't' (from the first infinitive) the 'extra t' appears in the other forms as for type I verbs:

haluta -> halutaan, haluttiin, haluttaisiin
tavata -> tavataan, tavattiin, tavattaisiin

  Type V verbs

All the verbs in this groups have infinitives ending in 'ita'. There are not that many of them, the most 'important' being 'tarvita' = 'to need'

The stem is formed by dropping the final 'a' and adding 'se': tarvitsen, tarvitset, tarvitsee, tarvitsemme, tarvitsette, tarvitsevat.

  Imperfect indicative

-si takes the place of -se, but in the third-person singular, there is only one vowel, e.g. tarvitsin, tarvitsit, tarvitsi, tarvitsimme, tarvitsitte, tarvitsivat.


The passive forms of these verbs are built just like those of type IV, since both types end in -ta:

valita -> valitaan, valittiin, valittaisiin
merkitä -> merkitään, merkitty, merkittäisiin

  Type VI verbs

Almost all the verbs of this type have infinitives ending in 'eta' (notable exceptions being 'parata' = 'to improve/become better' and 'huonota' = 'to deteriorate/become worse'. There are not many verbs which fall into this category of their 'own right', and these don't tend to be commonly used. However, it is a reasonably common route for turning adjectives into verbs (for example 'kylmä' = 'cold', 'kylmetä' = 'to get cold')

The stem for this type is formed by removing the 'ta' then adding 'ne' with the additional change that the final consonant of the stem is in its strong form:

'rohjeta' = 'to dare'
'rohkenen' = 'I dare'
'rohkenet' = 'you dare'
'rohkenee' = 'he/she/it dares' etc.
'paeta' = 'to escape', 'pakenen' = 'I escape'
'kylmetä' = 'to get cold', 'kylmenen' = 'I get cold'
'parata' = 'to improve' (intransitive), 'paranen' = 'I improve/get better'

  Imperfect indicative

The imperfect indicative of this type of verb is formed by replacing the final 'e' of the 'ne' stem with 'i'. Thus

'rohkenin' = 'I dared'
'rohkenit' = 'you dared'
'rohkeni' = 'he/she/it dared' etc.


Passives of this type are formed in the same way as for type IV verbs.

  Type VII verbs

Verbs of this category have infinitives ending in 'ata' or 'ätä'. The stem is formed by replacing this ending with 'aa' or 'ää', and hardening the grade of the final consonant, if applicable. Thus:

'vastata' = to answer
'vastaan' = I answer
'vastaat' = you answer
'vastaa' = he/she/it answers, etc.

  Imperfect indicative

The imperfect infinitive is formed by shortening the final 'aa' or 'ää' on the stem, leaving it in the hard grade, and adding 'si'.


The passive is almost identical to the infinitive:

'vastataan' = 'it is answered'
'on vastattu' = 'it has been answered', etc.

  Non-derivable and irregular stems

Standard Finnish has comparatively very few irregular verbs in addition to 'olla' discussed above. However, because the infinitive is an inflected form of the root, the consonant gradation may obscure the root. The root of the word 'juosta' = 'to run' is juoks-; when generating the infinitive, the pattern kss is applied: juoks+tajuosta. Epenthetic 'e' is added for personal forms, e.g. juoksen.

There is a rare pattern where a stem with -k- is rendered as -hdä in the infinitive, but disappears in gradation, e.g.:

'tehdä' = 'to do, make': tee-; teen, teet, tekee, teemme, teette, tekevät, etc.
'nähdä' = 'to see': näe-; näen, näet, näkee, näemme, näette, näkevät, etc.

That is, teke- and näke- forms are rendered as tehdä and nähdä in the infinitive but are subject to gradation of 'k' in personal forms like teen. In some colloquial forms, the 'e' is rendered as a chroneme instead: nään instead of näen etc.

Spoken language adds some more irregular verbs by assimilative deletion, e.g.:

tulla - tule - tuu
mennä - mene - mee
panna - pane - paa
olla - ole - oo

  Computer program for inflexion and syntax of the Finnish verb

  Online Finnish Verb Conjugators

http://www.romania-sanakirja.net/online/verbs/conjugate_verb.php http://www.verbix.com/languages/finnish.shtml

  Notes and References

  1. ^ Pirjo Leino: Suomen kielioppi pg 114 Infinitive Subject. Otava 1989
  2. ^ Note the archaic use of the instructive case of the third infinitive. A common error, even for native Finns, is to confuse this with the illative case, 'tappamaan', which would be incorrect. Nowadays, the first infinitive is used with 'pitää'
  3. ^ Savolainen, Erkki. Verkkokielioppi: Infinitiivit Finn Lectura 2001
  4. ^ Savolainen, Erkki. Verkkokielioppi: Partisiipit Finn Lectura 2001


All translations of Finnish verb conjugation

sensagent's content

  • definitions
  • synonyms
  • antonyms
  • encyclopedia

Dictionary and translator for handheld

⇨ New : sensagent is now available on your handheld

   Advertising ▼

sensagent's office

Shortkey or widget. Free.

Windows Shortkey: sensagent. Free.

Vista Widget : sensagent. Free.

Webmaster Solution


A windows (pop-into) of information (full-content of Sensagent) triggered by double-clicking any word on your webpage. Give contextual explanation and translation from your sites !

Try here  or   get the code


With a SensagentBox, visitors to your site can access reliable information on over 5 million pages provided by Sensagent.com. Choose the design that fits your site.

Business solution

Improve your site content

Add new content to your site from Sensagent by XML.

Crawl products or adds

Get XML access to reach the best products.

Index images and define metadata

Get XML access to fix the meaning of your metadata.

Please, email us to describe your idea.


The English word games are:
○   Anagrams
○   Wildcard, crossword
○   Lettris
○   Boggle.


Lettris is a curious tetris-clone game where all the bricks have the same square shape but different content. Each square carries a letter. To make squares disappear and save space for other squares you have to assemble English words (left, right, up, down) from the falling squares.


Boggle gives you 3 minutes to find as many words (3 letters or more) as you can in a grid of 16 letters. You can also try the grid of 16 letters. Letters must be adjacent and longer words score better. See if you can get into the grid Hall of Fame !

English dictionary
Main references

Most English definitions are provided by WordNet .
English thesaurus is mainly derived from The Integral Dictionary (TID).
English Encyclopedia is licensed by Wikipedia (GNU).


The wordgames anagrams, crossword, Lettris and Boggle are provided by Memodata.
The web service Alexandria is granted from Memodata for the Ebay search.
The SensagentBox are offered by sensAgent.


Change the target language to find translations.
Tips: browse the semantic fields (see From ideas to words) in two languages to learn more.

last searches on the dictionary :

5518 online visitors

computed in 0.047s

I would like to report:
section :
a spelling or a grammatical mistake
an offensive content(racist, pornographic, injurious, etc.)
a copyright violation
an error
a missing statement
please precise:



Company informations

My account



   Advertising ▼