Arabic Bulgarian Chinese Croatian Czech Danish Dutch English Estonian Finnish French German Greek Hebrew Hindi Hungarian Icelandic Indonesian Italian Japanese Korean Latvian Lithuanian Malagasy Norwegian Persian Polish Portuguese Romanian Russian Serbian Slovak Slovenian Spanish Swedish Thai Turkish Vietnamese
Arabic Bulgarian Chinese Croatian Czech Danish Dutch English Estonian Finnish French German Greek Hebrew Hindi Hungarian Icelandic Indonesian Italian Japanese Korean Latvian Lithuanian Malagasy Norwegian Persian Polish Portuguese Romanian Russian Serbian Slovak Slovenian Spanish Swedish Thai Turkish Vietnamese

definitions - Locus_of_control

Locus of Control (n.)

1.(MeSH)Personality construct referring to an individual's perception of the locus of events as determined internally by his or her own behavior versus fate, luck, or external forces. (ERIC Thesaurus, 1996).

   Advertizing ▼

definition (more)

definition of Wikipedia

synonyms - Locus_of_control

Locus of Control (n.) (MeSH)

F01.829.379, Internal-External Control  (MeSH)

   Advertizing ▼

analogical dictionary


Locus of control


Locus of control is a theory in personality psychology referring to the extent to which individuals believe that they can control events that affect them. Understanding of the concept was developed by Julian B. Rotter in 1954, and has since become an aspect of personality studies. A person's "locus" (Latin for "place" or "location") is conceptualised as either internal (the person believes they can control their life) or external (meaning they believe that their decisions and life are controlled by environmental factors which they cannot influence).

Individuals with a high internal locus of control believe that events in their life derive primarily from their own actions; for example, if a person with an internal locus of control does not perform as well as they wanted to on a test, they would blame it on lack of preparedness on their part. If they performed well on a test, they would attribute this to ability to study.[1]. In the test-performance example, if a person with a high external locus of control does poorly on a test, they might attribute this to the difficulty of the test questions. If they performed well on a test, they might think the teacher was lenient or that they were lucky.[1]

Those with a high internal locus of control exhibit better control of their behavior[citation needed], tend to be more politically involved[citation needed] and are more likely to attempt to influence others than are those with an external locus of control.[citation needed] They also assign greater likelihood to their efforts being successful, and more actively seek information concerning their situation.[citation needed]

Locus of control has generated much research in a variety of areas in psychology. The construct is applicable to fields such as educational psychology, health psychology or clinical psychology. There will probably continue to be debate about whether specific or more global measures of locus of control will prove to be more useful. Careful distinctions should also be made between locus of control (a concept linked with expectancies about the future) and attributional style (a concept linked with explanations for past outcomes), or between locus of control and concepts such as self-efficacy. The importance of locus of control as a topic in psychology is likely to remain quite central for many years.

Locus of control has also been included as one of four dimensions of core self-evaluations – one's fundamental appraisal of oneself – along with neuroticism, self-efficacy, and self-esteem. [2] The concept of core self-evaluations was first examined by Judge, Locke, and Durham (1997), and since has proven to have the ability to predict several work outcomes, specifically, job satisfaction and job performance. [3]



Locus of control is the framework of Rotter's (1954) social-learning theory of personality. In 1966 he published an article in Psychological Monographs which summarized over a decade of research (by Rotter and his students), much of it previously unpublished. In 1976, Herbert M. Lefcourt defined the perceived locus of control: "...a generalised expectancy for internal as opposed to external control of reinforcements". [4] Attempts have been made to trace the genesis of the concept to the work of Alfred Adler, but its immediate background lies in the work of Rotter and his students. Early work on the topic of expectations about control of reinforcement had been performed in the 1950s by James and Phares (prepared for unpublished doctoral dissertations supervised by Rotter at Ohio State University).[5]

Another Rotter student, William H. James (not to be confused with William James), studied two types of "expectancy shifts":

  • Typical expectancy shifts, believing that success (or failure) would be followed by a similar outcome
  • Atypical expectancy shifts, believing that success (or failure) would be followed by a dissimilar outcome

Weiners attribution theory as applied to student motivation

  Perceived locus of control
  Internal External
Attributions of
no control
Ability Chance/luck
Attributions of
Effort Task Difficulty

Additional research led to the hypothesis that typical expectancy shifts were displayed more often by those who attributed their outcomes to ability, whereas those who displayed atypical expectancy were more likely to attribute their outcomes to chance. This was interpreted that people could be divided into those who attribute to ability (an internal cause) versus those who attribute to luck (an external cause). Bernard Weiner argued that rather than ability-versus-luck, locus may relate to whether attributions are made to stable or unstable causes.

Rotter (1975, 1989) has discussed problems and misconceptions in others' use of the internal-versus-external construct.

  Personality orientation

Rotter (1975) cautioned that internality and externality represent two ends of a continuum, not an either/or typology. Internals tend to attribute outcomes of events to their own control. Externals attribute outcomes of events to external circumstances. It should not be thought, however, that internality is linked exclusively with attribution to effort and externality with attribution to luck (as Weiner's work —see below—makes clear). This has obvious implications for differences between internals and externals in terms of their achievement motivation, suggesting that internal locus is linked with higher levels of need for achievement. Due to their locating control outside themselves, externals tend to feel they have less control over their fate. People with an external locus of control tend to be more stressed and prone to clinical depression.[6]

Internals were believed by Rotter (1966) to exhibit two essential characteristics: high achievement motivation and low outer-directedness. This was the basis of the locus-of-control scale proposed by Rotter in 1966, although it was based on Rotter's belief that locus of control is a single construct. Since 1970, Rotter's assumption of uni-dimensionality has been challenged, with Levenson (for example) arguing that different dimensions of locus of control (such as beliefs that events in one's life are self-determined, or organized by powerful others and are chance-based) must be separated. Weiner's early work in the 1970s suggested that orthogonal to the internality-externality dimension, differences should be considered between those who attribute to stable and those who attribute to unstable causes.[7]

This meant that attributions could be to ability (an internal stable cause), effort (an internal unstable cause), task difficulty (an external stable cause) or luck (an external, unstable cause). This was how Weiner first saw these four causes, although he has been challenged as to whether people see luck (for example) as an external cause, whether ability is always perceived as stable and whether effort is always seen as changing. Indeed, in more recent publications (e.g. Weiner, 1980) he uses different terms for these four causes (such as "objective task characteristics" instead of "task difficulty" and "chance" instead of "luck"). Psychologists since Weiner have distinguished between stable and unstable effort, knowing that in some circumstances effort could be seen as a stable cause (especially given the presence of words such as "industrious" in English).

  Measuring scales

The most widely used questionnaire to measure locus of control is the 23-item (plus six filler items), forced-choice scale of Rotter (1966). However, this is not the only questionnaire; Bialer's (1961) 23-item scale for children predates Rotter's work. Also relevant to the locus-of-control scale are the Crandall Intellectual Ascription of Responsibility Scale (Crandall, 1965) and the Nowicki-Strickland Scale.[8] One of the earliest psychometric scales to assess locus of control (using a Likert-type scale, in contrast to the forced-choice alternative measure in Rotter's scale) was that devised by W. H. James for his unpublished doctoral dissertation, supervised by Rotter at Ohio State University; however, this remains unpublished.[9]

Many measures of locus of control have appeared since Rotter's scale. These were reviewed by Furnham and Steele (1993) and include those related to health psychology, industrial and organizational psychology and those specifically for children (such as the Stanford Preschool Internal-External Control Index[10] for three- to six-year-olds). Furnham and Steele (1993) cite data suggesting that the most reliable, valid questionnaire for adults is the Duttweiler scale. For a review of the health questionnaires cited by these authors, see "Applications" below.

The Duttweiler (1984) Internal Control Index (ICI) addresses perceived problems with the Rotter scales, including their forced-choice format, susceptibility to social desirability and heterogeneity (as indicated by factor analysis). She also notes that, while other scales existed in 1984 to measure locus of control, "they appear to be subject to many of the same problems".[11] Unlike the forced-choice format used on Rotter's scale, Duttweiler's 28-item ICI uses a Likert-type scale in which people must state whether they would rarely, occasionally, sometimes, frequently or usually behave as specified in each of 28 statements. The ICI assess variables pertinent to internal locus: cognitive processing, autonomy, resistance to social influence, self-confidence and delay of gratification. A small (133 student-subject) validation study indicated that the scale had good internal reliability (a Cronbach's alpha of 0.85).

  Attributional style

Attributional style (or explanatory style) is a concept introduced by Lyn Yvonne Abramson, Martin Seligman and John D. Teasdale; [12] Buchanan and Seligman (1995) have edited a book-length review of the topic. This concept goes a stage further than Weiner, stating that in addition to the concepts of internality-externality and stability a dimension of globality-specificity[clarification needed] is also needed. Abramson et al. believed that how people explained successes and failures in their lives related to whether they attributed these to internal or external factors, short-term or long-term factors, and factors that affected all situations.

The topic of attribution theory (introduced to psychology by Fritz Heider) has had an influence on locus-of-control theory, but differences exist between the history of these two models. Attribution theorists have been (largely speaking) social psychologists (concerned with the general processes characterizing how and why people make the attributions they do), whereas locus-of-control theorists have been more concerned with individual differences.

Significant to the history of both approaches were the contributions made by Bernard Weiner in the 1970s. Before this time, attribution theorists and locus-of-control theorists had been largely concerned with divisions into external and internal loci of causality. Weiner added the dimension of stability-instability (and later controllability), indicating how a cause could be perceived as having been internal to a person yet still beyond the person's control. The stability dimension added to the understanding of why people succeed or fail after such outcomes. Although not part of Weiner's model, a further dimension of attribution was added by Abramson, Seligman and Teasdale (globality-specificity).


Locus of control's bestknown application may have been in the area of health psychology, largely due to the work of Kenneth Wallston. Scales to measure locus of control in the health domain were reviewed by Furnham and Steele in 1993. The best-known are the Health Locus of Control Scale and the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control Scale, or MHLC.[13] The latter scale is based on the idea (echoing Levenson's earlier work) that health may be attributed to three sources: internal factors (such as self-determination of a healthy lifestyle), powerful others (such as one's doctor) or luck.

Some of the scales reviewed by Furnham and Steele (1993) relate to health in more specific domains, such as obesity (for example, Saltzer's (1982) Weight Locus of Control Scale or Stotland and Zuroff's (1990) Dieting Beliefs Scale), mental health (such as Wood and Letak's (1982) Mental Health Locus of Control Scale or the Depression Locus of Control Scale of Whiteman, Desmond and Price, 1987) and cancer (the Cancer Locus of Control Scale of Pruyn et al., 1988). In discussing applications of the concept to health psychology Furnham and Steele refer to Claire Bradley's work, linking locus of control to the management of diabetes mellitus. Empirical data on health locus of control in a number of fields was reviewed by Norman and Bennett in 1995; they note that data on whether certain health-related behaviors are related to internal health locus of control have been ambiguous. They note that some studies found that internal health locus of control is linked with increased exercise, but cite other studies which found a weak (or no) relationship between exercise behaviors (such as jogging) and internal health locus of control. A similar ambiguity is noted for data on the relationship between internal health locus of control and other health-related behaviors (such as breast self-examination, weight control and preventative-health behavior). Of particular interest are the data cited on the relationship between internal health locus of control and alcohol consumption.

Norman and Bennett note that some studies that compared alcoholics with non-alcoholics suggest alcoholism is linked to increased externality for health locus of control; however, other studies have linked alcoholism with increased internality. Similar ambiguity has been found in studies of alcohol consumption in the general, non-alcoholic population. They are more optimistic in reviewing the literature on the relationship between internal health locus of control and smoking cessation, although they also point out that there are grounds for supposing that powerful-others and internal-health loci of control may be linked with this behavior.

They argue that a stronger relationship is found when health locus of control is assessed for specific domains than when general measures are taken. Overall, studies using behavior-specific health locus scales have tended to produce more positive results.[14] These scales have been found to be more predictive of general behavior than more general scales, such as the MHLC scale.[15] Norman and Bennett cite several studies that used health-related locus-of-control scales in specific domains (including smoking cessation,[16] diabetes,[17] tablet-treated diabetes,[18] hypertension,[19] arthritis,[20] cancer,[21] and heart and lung disease.[22]

They also argue that health locus of control is better at predicting health-related behavior if studied in conjunction with health value (the value people attach to their health), suggesting that health value is an important moderator variable in the health locus of control relationship. For example, Weiss and Larsen (1990) found an increased relationship between internal health locus of control and health when health value was assessed.[23] Despite the importance Norman and Bennett attach to specific measures of locus of control, there are general textbooks on personality which cite studies linking internal locus of control with improved physical health, mental health and quality of life in people with diverse conditions: HIV, migraines, diabetes, kidney disease and epilepsy.[24]

During the 1970s and 1980s, Whyte correlated locus of control with the academic success of students enrolled in higher-education courses. Students who were more internally controlled believed that hard work and focus would result in successful academic progress, and they performed better academically. Those students who were identified as more externally controlled (believing that their future depended upon luck or fate) tended to have lower academic-performance levels. Cassandra B. Whyte researched how control tendency influenced behavioral outcomes in the academic realm by examining the effects of various modes of counseling on grade improvements and the locus of control of high-risk college students.[25][26]

  Organizational psychology and religion

Other fields to which the concept has been applied include industrial and organizational psychology, sports psychology, educational psychology and the psychology of religion. Richard Kahoe has published work in the latter field, suggesting that intrinsic religious orientation correlates positively (and extrinsic religious orientation correlates negatively) with internal locus.[27] Of relevance to both health psychology and the psychology of religion is the work of Holt, Clark, Kreuter and Rubio (2003) on a questionnaire to assess spiritual-health locus of control. The authors distinguished between an active spiritual-health locus of control (in which "God empowers the individual to take healthy actions"[28]) and a more passive spiritual-health locus of control (where health is left up to God). In industrial and organizational psychology, it has been found that internals are more likely to take positive action to change their jobs (rather than merely talk about occupational change) than externals.[29]

  Consumer research

Locus of control has also been applied to the field of consumer research. For example, Martin, Veer and Pervan (2007) examined how the weight locus of control of women (i.e., beliefs about the control of body weight) influence how they react to female models in advertising of different body shapes. They found that women who believe they can control their weight (“internals”), respond most favorably to slim models in advertising, and this favorable response is mediated by self-referencing. In contrast, women who feel powerless about their weight (“externals”), self-reference larger-sized models, but only prefer larger-sized models when the advertisement is for a non-fattening product. For fattening products, they exhibit a similar preference for larger-sized models and slim models. The weight locus of control measure was also found to be correlated with measures for weight control beliefs and willpower. [30]

  Familial origins

The development of locus of control is associated with family style and resources, cultural stability and experiences with effort leading to reward.[citation needed] Many internals have grown up with families modeling typical internal beliefs; these families emphasized effort, education, responsibility and thinking, and parents typically gave their children rewards they had promised them. In contrast, externals are typically associated with lower socioeconomic status. Societies experiencing social unrest increase the expectancy of being out-of-control; therefore, people in such societies become more external[citation needed].

The 1995 research of Schneewind suggests that "children in large single parent families headed by women are more likely to develop an external locus of control".[31][citation needed] Schultz and Schultz also claim that children in families where parents have been supportive and consistent in discipline develop internal locus of control. At least one study has found that children whose parents had an external locus of control are more likely to attribute their successes and failures to external causes.[32] Findings from early studies on the familial origins of locus of control were summarized by Lefcourt: "Warmth, supportiveness and parental encouragement seem to be essential for development of an internal locus".[33], but causal evidence regarding how parental locus of control influences offspring locus of control (whether genetic, or environmentally mediated) is lacking.

Locus of control becomes more internal with age[citation needed]. As children grow older, they gain skills which give them more control over their environment, however whether this, or bioldogical development is responsoble for changes in locus is unclear.


It is sometimes assumed that as people age they will become less internal and more external, but data here has been ambiguous.[34] Longitudinal data collected by Gatz and Karel (cited in Johnson et al., 2004[citation needed]) imply that internality may increase until middle age, decreasing thereafter. Noting the ambiguity of data in this area, Aldwin and Gilmer (2004) cite Lachman's claim that locus of control is ambiguous. Indeed, there is evidence here that changes in locus of control in later life relate more visibly to increased externality (rather than reduced internality) if the two concepts are taken to be orthogonal. Evidence cited by Schultz and Schultz (2005) (for example, Heckhausen and Schulz (1995) or Ryckman and Malikosi, 1975) suggests that locus of control increases in internality until middle age. The authors also note that attempts to control the environment become more pronounced between ages eight and fourteen.

A study published in the journal Psychosomatic Medicine examined the health effect of childhood locus of control. 7,500 British adults (followed from birth), who had shown an internal locus of control at age 10, were less likely to be overweight at age 30. The children who had an internal locus of control also appeared the have higher levels of self-esteem.[35]

  Gender-based differences

As Schultz and Schultz (2005) point out, significant gender differences in locus of control have not been found for adults in the U.S. population. However, these authors also note that there may be specific sex-based differences for specific categories of items to assess locus of control; for example, they cite evidence that men may have a greater internal locus for questions related to academic achievement.[36]

  Cross-cultural issues

The question of whether people from different cultures vary in locus of control has long been of interest to social psychologists. Japanese people tend to be more external in locus-of-control orientation than people in the U.S.; however, differences in locus of control between different countries within Europe (and between the U.S. and Europe) tend to be small.[37] As Berry et al. pointed out in 1992, ethnic groups within the United States have been compared on locus of control; African Americans in the U.S. are more external than whites, even when socioeconomic status is controlled.[38] Berry et al. also pointed out in 1992 how research on other ethnic minorities in the U.S. (such as Hispanics) has been ambiguous. More on cross-cultural variations in locus of control can be found in Shiraev and Levy (2004). Research in this area indicates that locus of control has been a useful concept for researchers in cross-cultural psychology.


Self-efficacy, a related concept introduced by Albert Bandura, has been measured by means of a psychometric scale.[39] It differs from locus of control by relating to competence in circumscribed situations and activities (rather than more general cross-situational beliefs about control). Bandura has also emphasised differences between self-efficacy and self-esteem, using examples where low self-efficacy (for instance, in ballroom dancing) are unlikely to result in low self-esteem because competence in that domain is not very important to an individual.

Smith (1989) has argued that locus of control only weakly measures self-efficacy; "only a subset of items refer directly to the subject's capabilities".[40] Smith noted that training in coping skills led to increases in self-efficacy, but did not affect locus of control as measured by Rotter's 1966 scale.

  See also


  1. ^ a b Carlson, N.R., et al. (2007). Psychology: The Science of Behaviour - 4th Canadian ed.. Toronto, ON: Pearson Education Canada.
  2. ^ Judge, T. A.; Locke, E. A.; Durham, C. C. (1997). "The dispositional causes of job satisfaction: A core evaluations approach". Research in Organizational Behavior 19: 151–188. 
  3. ^ Dormann, C.; Fay, D.; Zapf, D.; Frese, M. (2006). "A state-trait analysis of job satisfaction: On the effect of core self-evaluations". Applied Psychology: An International Review 55 (1): 27–51. DOI:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2006.00227.x. 
  4. ^ Lefcourt 1976, p. 27
  5. ^ Herbert M. Lefcourt, Locus of Control: Current Trends in Thory and Research. Psychology Press, 1982
  6. ^ Benassi, Sweeney & Dufour, 1988; cited in Maltby, Day & Macaskill, 2007.
  7. ^ Weiner, 1974
  8. ^ Nowicki and Strickland, 1971
  9. ^ Lefcourt, 1976
  10. ^ Mischel et al., 1974; cited in Furnham & Steele, 1993
  11. ^ Duttweiler 1984, p. 211
  12. ^ Abramson, Seligman and Teasdale, 1978.
  13. ^ Wallston, Wallston, & DeVellis, 1976; Wallston, Wallston, Kaplan & Maides, 1976
  14. ^ Lefcourt, 1991
  15. ^ Norman & Bennett, 1995, p. 72
  16. ^ Georgio & Bradley, 1992
  17. ^ Ferraro, Price, Desmond and Roberts, 1987
  18. ^ Bradley, Lewis, Jennings and Ward, 1990
  19. ^ Stantion, 1987
  20. ^ Nicasio et al., 1985
  21. ^ Pruyn et al., 1988
  22. ^ Allison, 1987
  23. ^ Norman and Bennett, 1995
  24. ^ Maltby, Day & Macaskill, 2007
  25. ^ Whyte, C., "An Integrated Counseling and Learning Assistance Center" (1980). New Directions Sourcebook-Learning Assistance Centers. Jossey-Bass, Inc.
  26. ^ Whyte, C., "Effective Conseling Methods for High-Risk College Freshmen (1978)." Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance. January, 6, (4). 198-200.
  27. ^ Kahoe, 1974
  28. ^ Holt et al., p294
  29. ^ Allen, Weeks and Moffat, 2005; cited in Maltby et al., 2007
  30. ^ Martin, Brett A. S., Ekant Veer and Simon J. Pervan (2007), "Self-Referencing and Consumer Evaluations of Larger-sized Female Models: A Weight Locus of Control Perspective", Marketing Letters, 18 (3), 197-209.
  31. ^ Schultz and Schultz (2005), p.439.
  32. ^ "Social Learning Theory of Julian B. Rotter" Archived from the original 2012-04-07.
  33. ^ Lefcourt, 1976, p. 100
  34. ^ Aldwin & Gilmer, 2004; Johnson, Grant, Plomin, Pedersen, Ahern, Berg & McClearn, 2001
  35. ^ http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080619/hl_nm/self_confident_dc;_ylt=AqQCX7YWjbZ2hPTBb4Adglqs0NUE
  36. ^ Strickland & Haley, 1980; cited in Schultz & Schultz, 2005.
  37. ^ Berry, Poortinga, Segall and Dasen, 1992.
  38. ^ Dyal, 1984; cited in Berry et al., 1992.
  39. ^ Sherer, Madux et al., 1982
  40. ^ Smith, p. 229.


  • Abramson, L.Y., Seligman, M.E.P., Teasdale, J.D. (1978). "Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation". Journal of Abnormal Psychology 87 (1): 49–74. DOI:10.1037/0021-843X.87.1.49. PMID 649856. 
  • Abramson, L.Y., Metasky, G.I., Alloy, L.B. (1989). "Hopelessness depression: A theory-based subtype of depression". Psychological Review 96 (2): 358–72. DOI:10.1037/0033-295X.96.2.358. 
  • Aldwin, C.M., Gilman, D.F. (2004). Health, Illness and Optimal Ageing. London: Sage. ISBN 0-7619-2259-8. 
  • Anderson, C. A., Jennings, D.L., Arnoult, L.H. (1988). "Validity and utility of the attributional style construct at a moderate level of specificity". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 55 (6): 979–90. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.55.6.979. 
  • Berry, J.W., Poortinga, Y.H.,Segall, M.H., Dasen, P.R. (1992). Cross-cultural Psychology: Research and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-37761-7. 
  • Buchanan, G.M., Seligman, M.E.P., ed. (1997). Explanatory Style. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ISBN [[Special:BookSources/0-8058-0924-5|0-8058-0924-5]]. 
  • Burns, M., Seligman, M.E.P. (1989). "Explanatory style across the lifespan". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56 (3): 471–7. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.56.3.471. PMID 2926642. 
  • Cutrona, C.E., Russell, D., Jones, R.D. (1985). "Cross-situational consistency in causal attributions: Does attributional style exist?". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 
  • Duttweiler, P.C. (1984). "The Internal Control Index: A Newly Developed Measure of Locus of Control". Educational and Psychological Measurement 44 (2): 209–21. DOI:10.1177/0013164484442004. 
  • Furnham, A., Steele, H. (1993). "Measures of Locus of Control: A critique of children's, health and work-related locus of control questionnaires". British Journal of Psychology 84 (4): 443–79. DOI:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1993.tb02495.x. PMID 8298858. 
  • Eisner, J.E. (1997). "The origins of explanatory style: Trust as a determinant of pessimism and optimism". In Buchanan, G.M., Seligman, M.E.P.. Explanatory Style. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. pp. 49–55. ISBN [[Special:BookSources/0-8058-0924-5|0-8058-0924-5]]. 
  • Gong-Guy, E., Hammen, C. (1980). "Causal perceptions of stressful events in depressed and nondepressed outpatients". Journal of Abnormal Psychology 89 (5): 662–9. DOI:10.1037/0021-843X.89.5.662. PMID 7410726. 
  • Holt, C.L., Clark, E.M., Kreuter, M.W., Rubio, D. (2003). "Spiritual Health locus of control and cancer beliefs among urban African American women". Health Psychology 22 (3): 294–9. DOI:10.1037/0278-6133.22.3.294. PMID 12790257. 
  • Kahoe, R. (1974). "Personality and achievement correlates of intrinsic and extrinsic religious orientations". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 29 (6): 812–8. DOI:10.1037/h0036222. 
  • Lefcourt, H.M. (1966). "Internal versus external control of reinforcement: A review". Psychological Bulletin 65 (4): 206–20. DOI:10.1037/h0023116. PMID 5325292. 
  • Lefcourt, H.M. (1976). Locus of Control: Current Trends in Theory and Research. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ISBN [[Special:BookSources/04701540440|04701540440]]. 
  • Maltby, J., Day, L., Macaskill, A. (2007). Personality, Individual Differences and Intelligence. Harlow: Pearson Prentice Hall. ISBN 0-13-12976-0. 
  • Norman, P., Antaki, C. (1988). "The Real Events Attributional Style Questionnaire". Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 7 (2–3): 97–100. DOI:10.1521/jscp.1988.7.2-3.97. 
  • Norman, P., Bennett, P. (1995). "3. Health Locus of Control". In Conner, M., Norman, P.. Predicting Health Behaviour. Buckingham: Open University Press. pp. 62–94. 
  • Nowicki, S., Strickland, B. (1973). "A locus of control scale for children". Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 42: 148–55. DOI:10.1037/h0033978. 
  • Peterson, C., Semmel, A., von Baeyer, C., Abramson, L., Metalsky, G.I., Seligman, M.E.P. (1982). "The Attributional Style Questionnaire". Cognitive Therapy and Research 6 (3): 287–9. DOI:10.1007/BF01173577. 
  • Robbins and Hayes (1997). "The role of causal attributions in the prediction of depression". In Buchanan, G.M., Seligman, M.E.P.. Explanatory Style. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. pp. 71–98. ISBN [[Special:BookSources/0-8058-0924-5|0-8058-0924-5]]. 
  • Rotter, J.B. (1954). Social learning and clinical psychology. NY: Prentice-Hall. 
  • Rotter, J.B. (1966). "Generalized expectancies of internal versus external control of reinforcements". Psychological Monographs 80 (609). 
  • Rotter, J.B. (1975). "Some problems and misconceptions related to the construct of internal versus external control of reinforcement". Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 43: 56–67. DOI:10.1037/h0076301. 
  • Rotter, J.B. (1990). "Internal versus external control of reinforcement: A case history of a variable". American Psychologist 45 (4): 489–93. DOI:10.1037/0003-066X.45.4.489. http://mres.gmu.edu/readings/PSYC557/Rotter1990.pdf. Retrieved 10 December 2010. 
  • Schultz, D.P., Schultz, S.E. (2005). Theories of Personality (8th ed.). Wadsworth: Thomson. ISBN 0-534-62402-2. 
  • Sherer, M., Maddux, J., et al. (1982). "The self-efficacy scale: Construction and validation". Psychological Reports 51 (2): 663–71. DOI:10.2466/pr0.1982.51.2.663. 
  • Shiraev, E., Levy, D. (2004). Cross-cultural Psychology: Critical Thinking and Contemporary Applications (2nd ed.). Boston: Pearson. ISBN 0-205-38612-1. 
  • Smith, R.E. (1989). "Effects of coping skills training on generalized self-efficacy and locus of control". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56 (2): 228–33. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.228. PMID 2926626. 
  • Wallston, K.A., Wallston, B.S., Devellis, R. (1978). "Development of Multidimensional Health Locus of Control (MHLC) Scales". Health Education Monographs 6 (2): 160–70. PMID 689890. 
  • Weiner, B., ed. (1974). Achievement Motivation and Attribution Theory. NY: General Learning Press. 
  • Weiner, B. (1980). Human Motivation. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. 
  • Whyte, C., "An Integrated Counseling and Learning Assistance Center" (1980). New Directions Sourcebook-Learning Assistance Centers. Jossey-Bass, Inc.
  • Whyte, C. (January 1978). "Effective Conseling Methods for High-Risk College Freshmen". Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance 6 (4): 198–200. 
  • Xenikou, A.; Furnham, A., McCarrey, M. (1997). "Attributional style for negative events: A proposition for a more valid and reliable measaure of attributional style". British Journal of Psychology 88: 53–69. DOI:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1997.tb02620.x. 

  External links

External link for Attributional Style:



All translations of Locus_of_control

sensagent's content

  • definitions
  • synonyms
  • antonyms
  • encyclopedia

Dictionary and translator for handheld

⇨ New : sensagent is now available on your handheld

   Advertising ▼

sensagent's office

Shortkey or widget. Free.

Windows Shortkey: sensagent. Free.

Vista Widget : sensagent. Free.

Webmaster Solution


A windows (pop-into) of information (full-content of Sensagent) triggered by double-clicking any word on your webpage. Give contextual explanation and translation from your sites !

Try here  or   get the code


With a SensagentBox, visitors to your site can access reliable information on over 5 million pages provided by Sensagent.com. Choose the design that fits your site.

Business solution

Improve your site content

Add new content to your site from Sensagent by XML.

Crawl products or adds

Get XML access to reach the best products.

Index images and define metadata

Get XML access to fix the meaning of your metadata.

Please, email us to describe your idea.


The English word games are:
○   Anagrams
○   Wildcard, crossword
○   Lettris
○   Boggle.


Lettris is a curious tetris-clone game where all the bricks have the same square shape but different content. Each square carries a letter. To make squares disappear and save space for other squares you have to assemble English words (left, right, up, down) from the falling squares.


Boggle gives you 3 minutes to find as many words (3 letters or more) as you can in a grid of 16 letters. You can also try the grid of 16 letters. Letters must be adjacent and longer words score better. See if you can get into the grid Hall of Fame !

English dictionary
Main references

Most English definitions are provided by WordNet .
English thesaurus is mainly derived from The Integral Dictionary (TID).
English Encyclopedia is licensed by Wikipedia (GNU).


The wordgames anagrams, crossword, Lettris and Boggle are provided by Memodata.
The web service Alexandria is granted from Memodata for the Ebay search.
The SensagentBox are offered by sensAgent.


Change the target language to find translations.
Tips: browse the semantic fields (see From ideas to words) in two languages to learn more.

last searches on the dictionary :

5253 online visitors

computed in 0.125s

I would like to report:
section :
a spelling or a grammatical mistake
an offensive content(racist, pornographic, injurious, etc.)
a copyright violation
an error
a missing statement
please precise:



Company informations

My account



   Advertising ▼

Acc, Locus of Control: Current Trends in Theory & Research, , 0898592224, Book (10.46 USD)

Commercial use of this term

Locus of Control: Current Trends in Theory and Research (5.86 USD)

Commercial use of this term

Locus of control in personality 1976 by Phares, E. Jerry 0382250737 (4.48 USD)

Commercial use of this term

The Control of the Ocellar Bristle by the Scute Locus in Drosophila Melanogaster (125.0 USD)

Commercial use of this term

Research With the Locus of Control Construct: Developments in Social Problems (113.43 USD)

Commercial use of this term

(DJ208) Gecko Chamber, Locus of Control - DJ CD (2.45 GBP)

Commercial use of this term

G, Research With the Locus of Control Construct: Developments in Social Problems (111.29 USD)

Commercial use of this term

Acc, Research With the Locus of Control Construct: Extensions and Limitations, , (23.39 USD)

Commercial use of this term

Variations in Test Anxiety and Locus of Control Orientation - In Achieving and U (64.72 USD)

Commercial use of this term

Participation in Budgeting, Locus of Control and Organizational Effectiveness... (18.2 USD)

Commercial use of this term