Recognition of same-sex unions in the District of Columbia
|Legal recognition of|
|Performed in some jurisdictions|
|Recognized, not performed|
|Civil unions and|
|Performed in some jurisdictions|
|In some regions|
|Status in other jurisdictions|
Same-sex marriage is currently not performed in the District of Columbia, but the District does recognize same-sex marriages performed elsewhere as being valid in the city. Same-sex marriage was legalized on December 18, 2009, when mayor Adrian Fenty signed a bill passed by the Council of the District of Columbia on December 15, 2009. Following the signing the measure entered a mandatory Congressional review of 30 work days. It is considered unlikely that the law will be overturned. According to the Associated Press the law will likely take effect on March 2, 2010.
In addition to recognizing same-sex marriages, since 1992 the District has also allowed residents to enter into registered domestic partnerships; since the passage of the Domestic Partnership Judicial Determination of Parentage Act of 2009, the District recognizes civil unions and domestic partnerships performed in other jurisdictions that have all the rights and responsibilites of marriage. The law gives the mayor discretion to recognize relationships from states with lesser benefits.
Recognition of out-of-state marriages
On April 7, 2009, the same day that Vermont legalized same-sex marriage, the District of Columbia council voted unanimously (12-0) to recognize same-sex marriages performed in other "jurisdictions". The move was hailed as a possible gateway to legislation of same-sex marriage in the near future. Under the District's procedures, the bill was voted on again on May 5, 2009, passing with a 12-1 vote. The act was signed by Mayor Adrian Fenty and was subject to a review period, which expired on July 7, 2009 at 12:01am.
On June 13th, the Board of Elections ruled that a petition seeking to repeal the law and delay its enactment until a vote was held in a referendum, would be invalid as it would violate provisions of the Human Right Act which specifically disallow the public voting against several protected classes - one being, sexual orientation.
On June 30th, 2009, a D.C. Superior Court judge ruled against a group opposed to the new law, who wanted a referendum on the issue, and had also asked the Court to delay the enactment of the new law until the court decided the full case, and also allowed the voters to weigh in. The group had filed with the Court 3 weeks after the passage of the new law, Judge Judith E. Retchin ruled "there was no excuse" for them to file their lawsuit so late. She also agreed with the Board's decision that allowing a vote on the issue would violate the Human Rights Act. Washington Post
Domestic partnership benefits
Domestic partnership in the District is open to both same-sex and opposite-sex couples. One of the unusual features of the original bill establishing domestic partnerships was that it allowed partnerships to be created between people who were related by blood (e.g., siblings or a parent and adult child, provided both were single). All couples registered as domestic partners are entitled to the same rights as family members and spouses to visit their domestic partners in the hospital and jail and to make decisions concerning the treatment of a domestic partner’s remains and estate after the partner’s death.
The measure also grants District of Columbia government employees rights to a number of benefits. Domestic partners are eligible for health care insurance coverage, can use annual leave or unpaid leave for the birth or adoption of a dependent child or to care for a domestic partner or a partner's dependents, and can make funeral arrangements for a deceased partner.
The original bill establishing Domestic Partnerships in the District of Columbia was known as "The Health Benefits Expansion Act." It was passed by the City Council and signed into law by the Mayor of Washington, D.C. The bill became law on June 11, 1992. Every year between 1992 and 2002, the Republican leadership of the U.S. Congress added a rider to the District of Columbia appropriations bill that prohibited the use of federal or local funds to implement the Health Care Benefits Expansion Act. The law was finally implemented in fiscal year 2002 after Congress failed to add the rider to the appropriations bill.
Since the 2002 implementation of domestic partners, the benefits attached to Domestic Partnerships has been expanded many times. In the Health Care Decisions Act of 2003 domestic partners were given the right to make health care decisions for their partners. The Deed Recordation Tax and Related Amendments Amendment Act of 2004 provided equal treatment, like spouses, of domestic partners for the purpose of paying the deed recordation tax. Expanding benefits further, the Department Of Motor Vehicles Reform Amendment Act Of 2004 exempted domestic partners from the excise tax payable for transfer of title to your partner. And the Domestic Partnership Protection Amendment Act of 2004 amended the definition of the term "marital status" in the Human Rights Act of 1997 to include domestic partners.
The Domestic Partnership Equality Amendment Act of 2006 was a major expansion of the benefits of domestic partners. The law came into effect on April 4, 2006. This act provides that in almost all cases a domestic partner will have the same rights as a spouse regarding inheritance, probate, guardianship, and certain other rights traditionally accorded to spouses. The act also gave the right to form premarital agreements for prospective partners, and for domestic partners to not testify against their partner in court. However, it does not extend most benefits of legal marriage to domestic partners, such as the marital estate tax deduction. At the time of this latest expansion coming into effect in April 2006, there were 587 registered couples.
The District of Columbia Council and Mayor of Washington, D.C., once again, incrementally expanded the domestic partnership rights when in March 2007, the right to jointly file local taxes as domestic partners became law with the passage of the Domestic Partnerships Joint Filing Act of 2006.
On May 6, 2008, the District of Columbia city council unanimously passed the Omnibus Domestic Partnership Equality Amendment Act of 2008. According to the Washington Blade, "the bill provides both rights and obligations for domestic partners in a total of 39 separate laws that touch on such areas as rental housing, condominiums, real estate transactions, nursing homes, life insurance, worker’s compensation, investigations into child abuse and the police department’s musical band, among other areas," thus "bringing the law to a point where same-sex couples who register as domestic partners will receive most, but not quite all, of the rights and benefits of marriage under District law."
On Wednesday, May 06, 2009 DC passed the Jury And Marriage Amendment Act 2009 and on the same day the Mayor signed it into law, the law become effective from 7 July, 2009. This allows same-sex marriage to be fully legally recognized from other places where they are currently legal - but still cannot be performed within DC.
On May 20, 2009 the Domestic Partnership Judicial Determination of Parentage Act 2009 passed and signed into law allowing DC recognition of other states domestic partnerships and amends DC laws on parentage entitlements and rights to children from adult domestic partnerships. The proposed law became effective from July 20, 2009.
D.C. Councilman David Catania introduced a bill called the Religious Freedom And Civil Marriage Equality Amendment Act 2009 on Tuesday October 6, 2009 to allow same-sex couples to wed. 
On 17 November, the D.C. Board of Ethics and Elections rejected a proposed ballot measure to halt same-sex marriage, saying that the proposed ballot measure "authorizes discrimination prohibited under the District of Columbia Human Rights Act."
On December 1, 2009 the Religious Freedom And Civil Marriage Equality Amendment Act 2009 passed by a vote of 11-2 on the first reading, but it included a clause to abolish domestic partnerships from 2011. The second reading was voted on December 15, 2009. The measure passed by a vote of 11-2 with amendments to keep the domestic partnership law all in-tact. The bill has received the Mayor's signature one week later, and must now survive a "30 day Congressional review period" before it becomes law.
Economic Impact of Allowing Marriage for Same Sex Couples
A UCLA study concluded that extending marriage to same-sex couples will boost the District of Columbia’s economy by over $52.2 million over three years, which would generate increases in local government tax and fee revenues by $5.4 million and create approximately 700 new jobs. This analysis estimates the impact on business revenue and local government revenues, if D.C. were to extend marriage to same-sex couples.
- ↑ "D.C. mayor signs same-sex marriage bill". CNN. December 18, 2009. http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/12/18/d-c-mayor-signs-same-sex-marriage-bill/. Retrieved December 18, 2009.
- ↑ Gresko, Jessica (January 13, 2010). "March 2 day DC gay marriage law likely in effect". Associated Press (The Seattle Times). http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2010786526_apusdcgaymarriage.html. Retrieved January 14, 2010.
- ↑ Associated Press (July 7, 2009). "Washington, D.C., Recognizes Same-Sex Marriages". New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/08/us/08marriage.html. Retrieved 01 December 2009.
- ↑ Gaynair, Gillian (July 7, 2009). "Gay Marriage Bill Takes Effect in Nation's Capital". Christian Broadcasting Network. http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/politics/2009/July/Gay-Marriage-Bill-Takes-Effect-in-Nations-Capital/. Retrieved 01 December 2009.
- ↑ "JURY AND MARRIAGE AMENDMENT ACT OF 2009". DC City Council. http://www.dccouncil.washington.dc.us/lims/legislation.aspx?LegNo=B18-0010&Description=DISCLOSURE-TO-THE-UNITED-STATES-DISTRICT-COURT--AMENDMENT-ACT-OF-2009.&ID=21817. Retrieved 01 December 2009.
- ↑ DC recognizes foreign gay marriages
- ↑ D.C. Gay Marriage Measure Set for Mayor's Signature
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.5 "Domestic Partnership". DC Department of Health, Vital Records Division. http://dchealth.dc.gov/doh/cwp/view,a,3,q,573324,dohNav_GID,1787,dohNav,/33110/33120/33139/.asp#6. Retrieved 2007-07-30.
- ↑ "D.C. Domestic Partnership Program". Human Rights Campaign. http://www.glaa.org/archive/2001/dpfactsheet103001.shtml. Retrieved 2008-05-15.
- ↑ "Registration for Domestic Partnership". Partners Task Force for Gay and Lesbian Couples. http://www.buddybuddy.com/d-p-reg.html. Retrieved 2007-07-30.
- ↑ "GLAA celebrates as new domestic partnership joint filing law takes effect". Gay and Lesbian Activists Alliance of Washington. http://www.glaa.org/archive/2007/glaacelebratesdpjointtaxfilingact0321.shtml. Retrieved 2008-05-15.
- ↑ Chibbaro, Lou (2008-05-16). "D.C. Council expands DP law". Washington Blade. http://www.washingtonblade.com/2008/5-16/news/localnews/12599.cfm. Retrieved 2008-05-17.
- ↑ http://www.dccouncil.washington.dc.us/lims/legislation.aspx
- ↑ http://www.dccouncil.washington.dc.us/lims/legislation.aspx?LegNo=B18-0066&Description=DOMESTIC-PARTNERSHIP-JUDICIAL-DETERMINATION-OF-PARENTAGE-ACT-OF-2009.&ID=21942
- ↑ http://www.dccouncil.washington.dc.us/images/00001/20090529111806.pdf
- ↑ http://washingtontimes.com/news/2009/oct/07/same-sex-marriage-bill-set-in-dc/ DC Councilman introduces same-sex marriage bill.
- ↑ http://www.dccouncil.washington.dc.us/lims/legislation.aspx?LegNo=B18-0482&Description=RELIGIOUS-FREEDOM-AND-CIVIL-MARRIAGE-EQUALITY-AMENDMENT-ACT-OF-2009.&ID=23204
- ↑ http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/18/us/18brfs-NOMEASURETOB_BRF.html
- ↑ http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/nov/18/dc-vote-on-gay-marriage-denied/
- ↑ http://www.hrcbackstory.org/2009/12/mayor-adrian-fenty-signs-dc-marriage-bill/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+HrcBackStory+%28HRC+Back+Story%29
- ↑ Ramos, Christopher; Badgett, M.V. Lee; Sears, Brad (April 2009). [http://www.law.ucla.edu/williamsinstitute/pdf/DC%20Econ%20Impact.pdf "The Economic Impact of Extending Marriage to Same-Sex Couples in the District of Columbia"] (PDF). The Williams Institute. University of California Los Angeles School of Law. http://www.law.ucla.edu/williamsinstitute/pdf/DC%20Econ%20Impact.pdf.
- DC Department of Health
- Vital Records Division, Domestic Partnership Information
- "District of Columbia Marriage/Relationship Recognition Law," Human Rights Campaign
- "Rights and Responsibilities of Domestic Partners in the District of Columbia," Gay and Lesbian Activists Alliance of Washington, DC, revised April 3, 2006
- "Registration for Domestic Partnership," Partners Task Force for Gay and Lesbian Couples
- Same-sex marriage
- Same-sex marriage in the United States
- Same-sex marriage legislation in the United States
- Same-sex marriage in the United States by state
- Same-sex marriage in the United States public opinion
- Same-sex marriage status in the United States by state
- List of benefits of marriage in the United States
- Defense of Marriage Act
- Marriage Protection Act
- Defense of marriage amendment
- Federal Marriage Amendment
- Domestic partnerships in the United States
- Freedom to Marry Coalition
- History of civil marriage in the U.S.