School corporal punishment
|Part of a series on|
|Domestic · School · Judicial|
|Belting · Birching · Caning|
Cat o' nine tails · Flagellation
Foot whipping · Knout · Paddle
Slippering · Spanking · Strapping
Switch · Tawse
|Malaysia · Singapore · Taiwan|
|CFCYL v. Canada · Ingraham v. Wright|
|Campaigns against corporal punishment|
School corporal punishment covers official punishments of school students for misbehaviour that involve striking the student a given number of times in a generally methodical and premeditated ceremony. The punishment is usually administered either across the buttocks or on the hands, with an implement specially kept for the purpose such as a rattan cane, wooden paddle, or leather strap. Less commonly, it could also include spanking or smacking the student in a deliberate manner on a specific part of the body with the open hand, especially at the elementary school level.
Advocates of school corporal punishment argue that it provides an immediate response to indiscipline and that the student is quickly back in the classroom learning, rather than being suspended from school. Opponents believe that other disciplinary methods are equally or more effective. Some regard it as tantamount to violence or abuse.
In most places, corporal punishment in public schools is governed by official regulations laid down by governments or local education authorities, defining such things as the implement to be used, the number of strokes that may be administered, which members of staff may carry it out, and whether parents must be informed or consulted. Depending on how narrowly the regulations are drawn and how rigorously enforced, this has the effect of making the punishment a structured ceremony that is legally defensible in a given jurisdiction and of inhibiting staff from lashing out on the spur of the moment.
Corporal punishment used to be prevalent in schools in many parts of the world, but in recent decades it has been outlawed in most of Europe and in Canada, Japan, South Africa, New Zealand and several other countries (see list of countries, below). It remains commonplace in a number of countries in Africa, south-east Asia and the Middle East (see list of countries, below).
In the United States, the Supreme Court ruling in Ingraham v. Wright (1977) held that school corporal punishment does not violate the federal Constitution. Paddling continues to be used to a significant extent in a number of Southern states, though there has been a sharp decline in its incidence over the past 20 years.
In some Asian and African countries where it has been theoretically outlawed, it is still used in practice.
Much of the traditional culture that surrounds corporal punishment in school, at any rate in the English-speaking world, derives largely from British practice in the 19th and 20th centuries, particularly as regards the caning of teenage boys. There is a vast amount of literature on this, in both popular and serious culture. Britain itself outlawed the practice in 1987 for state schools and more recently for all schools.
Many schools in Singapore and Malaysia use caning (for boys) as a routine official punishment for misconduct, as also some African countries. In some Middle Eastern countries whipping is used. In South Korea, male and female secondary students alike are commonly spanked in school. (See list of countries, below.)
In most of continental Europe, school corporal punishment has been banned for several decades, much longer in certain countries. As a formal deliberate ceremony, it seems to have been more common in northern/Protestant countries of Germanic culture than in southern/Catholic countries of Latin culture. Caning was not completely abolished until 1967 in Denmark and 1983 in Germany. (See list of countries, below.)
From the 1917 revolution onwards, corporal punishment was outlawed in the Soviet Union as contrary to communist ideology. Soviet visitors to western schools would express shock at its use. Other communist regimes followed suit: for instance, corporal punishment remains outlawed in present-day North Korea and (in theory) in mainland China. Meanwhile, communists in other countries such as Britain took the lead in campaigning against school corporal punishment, which they claimed was a symptom of the decadence of "capitalist" education systems.
Justification and criticism
Principal David Nixon, a supporter of corporal punishment in schools, says that as soon as the student has been punished he can go back to his class and continue learning, in contrast to out-of-school suspension, which removes him from the educational process and gives him a free "holiday".
Philip Berrigan, another supporter of corporal punishment, says that the corporal punishment saves much staff time that would otherwise have to be devoted to supervising detention classes or in-school suspension, and managing the bureaucracy that goes with these punishments. Parents, too, often complain about the inconvenience occasioned by penalties such as detention or Saturday school.
One argument made against corporal punishments is that some research has shown it to be not as effective as positive means for managing student behaviour. These studies have linked corporal punishment to adverse physical, psychological and educational outcomes including, "increased aggressive and destructive behaviour, increased disruptive classroom behaviour, vandalism, poor school achievement, poor attention span, increased drop-out rate, school avoidance and school phobia, low self-esteem, anxiety, somatic complaints, depression, suicide and retaliation against teacher."
Medical, pediatric or psychological societies opposing school corporal punishment include: the American Medical Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the Society for Adolescent Medicine, the American Psychological Association, the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, the Royal College of Psychiatrists, the Canadian Paediatric Society and the Australian Psychological Society. School corporal punishment is also opposed by the (U.S.) National Association of Secondary School Principals.
Country by country
In Australia, corporal punishment is banned by law in all schools in the Australian Capital Territory, New South Wales, and Tasmania. In Victoria, it is banned in government schools but not in private schools. The state government currently has a program for its removal as a condition of school registration. Corporal punishment is banned in government schools under ministerial guidelines or local educational policy, but is lawful in private schools in Western Australia, Queensland and South Australia. In the Northern Territory there is currently no legal prohibition.
School corporal punishment was banned in 1974.
In Canadian Foundation for Children, Youth and the Law v. Canada (2004) the Supreme Court outlawed school corporal punishment. In public schools, the usual implement was a rubber/canvas strap applied to the hands, while private schools often used a paddle or cane administered to the student's posterior. In many parts of Canada, 'the strap' had not been used in public schools since the 1970s or even earlier: thus, it has been claimed that it had not been used in Quebec since the 1960s, and in Toronto it was banned in 1971. However, some schools in Alberta had been using the strap up until the ban in 2004.
School Corporal Punishment Bans in Canadian Provinces
Every province except Alberta, Ontario, and Saskatchewan had banned corporal punishment in public schools before the above-mentioned 2004 ban, though British Columbia and Manitoba were the only provinces to ban it in both public and private schools. They are, in chronological order by year of provincial ban:
- British Columbia - 1973
- Nova Scotia - 1989
- New Brunswick - 1990
- Yukon - 1990
- Prince Edward Island - 1993
- Northwest Territories - 1995
- Nunavut - 1995
- Newfoundland and Labrador - 1997
- Quebec - 1997
Although it has not been explicitly prohibited by law, corporal punishment is not included in the permitted disciplinary measures.
A 1998 study found that physical punishment is used extensively by teachers in Egypt to punish behavior they regard as unacceptable. Around 80% of the boys and 60% of the girls by teachers using their hands, sticks, straps, shoes, and kicks. The most common reported injuries were bumps and contusions; wound, fractures, loss of consciousness and concussion were less common.
The systematic use of corporal punishment has been absent from French schools since the 19th century. There is no explicit legal ban on it, but in 2008 a teacher was fined for slapping a student.
School corporal punishment, historically widespread, was outlawed in different states via their administrative law at different times. It was not completely abolished everywhere until 1983. At the latest since 1993 a corporal punishment by a teacher is a criminal offence. In that year a sentence by the Federal Court of Justice of Germany (NStZ 1993,591) was published which overruled the previous powers enshrined in customary law and upheld by some regional appeal courts (Oberlandesgericht) even in the 1970s. They assumed a right of chastisement was a defense of justification against the accusation of | Causing bodily harm, Section 223 Strafgesetzbuch.
Corporal punishment in Greek primary schools was banned in 1998, and in secondary schools in 2005.
In India, there is no school corporal punishment in the western sense of the term. By definition, school corporal punishment "is not to be confused with mere hitting, where a teacher lashes out at a student on the spur of the moment, which is not corporal punishment but brutality". The Supreme Court of India banned this type of brutality in schools in 2000, and 17 out of 28 states claim to apply the ban, though enforcement is lax. In 2009 incidents of brutality still took place. A number of social and cultural organizations, including Shukrachakra are campaigning against corporal punishment in India.
In schools in the Irish Republic, corporal punishment was banned by regulation in 1982, and its use became a criminal offence in 1996.
Banned in 1928.
Although legally banned in 1947, corporal punishment was still found in some schools in the 1980s. In late 1987, about 60% of junior high school teachers felt it was necessary, with 7% believing it was necessary in all conditions, 59% believing it should be applied sometimes and 32% disapproving of it in all circumstances; while at elementary (primary) schools, 2% supported it unconditionally, 47% felt it was necessary and 49% disapproved.
Caning is a common form of discipline in some Malaysian schools. Legally it should be applied only to male students, but the idea of making the caning of girls lawful has recently been debated. This would be applied to the palm of the hand, whereas boys are typically caned across the seat of the trousers.
It was banned in 1920.
Corporal punishment is prohibited in private and public schools.
Corporal punishment is legal in Singapore schools (for male students only), and fully encouraged by the government in order to maintain strict discipline. Only a light rattan cane may be used. This must be administered in a formal ceremony by the school management after due deliberation, not by classroom teachers. Most secondary schools (whether independent, autonomous or government-controlled), and also some primary schools and one or two post-secondary institutions, use caning to deal with misconduct by boys. At the secondary and post-secondary level, the rattan strokes are always delivered to the student's clothed posterior. The Ministry of Education has stipulated a maximum of six strokes per occasion. In some cases the ceremony is performed in front of the other students.
Corporal punishment is lawful in South Korean schools. It usually takes the form of disciplining the student with a stick that is too rigid and thick to be called a cane in the traditional British sense. It is often applied to the student's clothed buttocks, but may also be given on the calves, the soles of the feet, or the back of the thighs. Boys and girls alike are frequently punished in this manner by teachers for any offence in school. Government recommendations are that the stick should not be thicker than 1.5 cm (0.59 in) in diameter and that the number of strokes should not exceed 10. These punishments are typically administered in a classroom or corridor with other students present, and the procedure is generally less formal and premeditated than in some other countries such as Singapore. It is common for several students to receive corporal punishment together.
Banned in 1985.
Corporal punishment at school has been prohibited in folkskolestadgan (the elementary school ordinance) since 1958.
Corporal punishment in schools is illegal under the Ministry of Education Regulation on Student Punishment (2005) and the National Committee on Child Protection Regulation on Working Procedures of Child Protection Officers Involved in Promoting Behaviour of Students (2005), pursuant to article 65 of the Child Protection Act.
In state-run schools, and also in private schools where at least part of the funding came from government, corporal punishment was outlawed by Parliament with effect from 1987. In other private schools it was banned in 1999 (England and Wales), 2000 (Scotland) and 2003 (Northern Ireland).
The implement used in many state and private schools in England and Wales was a flexible rattan cane, applied either to the student's hands or (especially in the case of teenage boys) to the seat of the trousers. Slippering was widely used as a less formal alternative. In a few English cities, a strap was used instead of the cane.
More than 20 years after abolition in state schools, there persists a marked lack of consensus on corporal punishment. A 2008 poll of 6,162 UK teachers by the Times Educational Supplement found that one in five teachers, and 22% of secondary teachers, would still back the use of caning in extreme cases. Meanwhile government research suggests that many British citizens believe that the removal of corporal punishment in schools has been a contributory factor in what is perceived to be a general decline in pupil behaviour.
In 1867 New Jersey became the first U.S. state to abolish corporal punishment in schools. The second was Massachusetts 104 years later in 1971. Currently, corporal punishment is banned in public schools in 30 U.S. states. In two of these states, New Jersey and Iowa, it is illegal in private schools as well.
Corporal punishment in American schools is administered to the seat of the student's trousers or skirt with a specially-made wooden paddle. This often used to take place in the classroom or hallway, but nowadays the punishment is usually given privately in the principal's office.
Most public school districts lay down detailed rules as to how the ceremony is to be carried out, and in many cases these are published in the school's student-parent handbook.
Individual US states have the power to ban corporal punishment in their schools. The 20 states that have not banned it are mostly in the South. It is still used to a significant (though declining) degree in some public schools in Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, Oklahoma, Tennessee and Texas.
The most recent state to outlaw school corporal punishment was Ohio in 2009.
Private schools in most states are exempt from state bans and may choose to use the paddle. Here too, most of those which actually do so are to be found in Southern states. These are largely, but by no means exclusively, Christian evangelical or fundamentalist schools.
The anti-spanking campaign Center for Effective Discipline, extrapolating from sample statistics collected by federal authorities, estimates that the number of students spanked or paddled in 2006 in U.S. public schools was about 223,000.
Statistics show that black students are more likely to be paddled than white students. This might be because black Americans tend to be more in favour of spanking than white ones on average, so are more likely to give teachers permission to spank their children -- although a study in Kentucky found that minority students were disproportionately targeted by discipline policies generally, not only corporal punishment.
Federal statistics consistently show that around 80% of school paddlings in the U.S. are of boys, most likely because boys exhibit more often than girls the kinds of misbehaviour for which corporal punishment is thought appropriate.
U.S. States Banning School Corporal Punishment
Thirty U.S. states and the District of Columbia have banned corporal punishment from use in public schools. The states, in chronological order of the year they banned, are:
New Jersey - 1867
Massachusetts - 1971
Hawaii - 1973
Maine - 1975
District of Columbia - 1977
New Hampshire - 1983
New York - 1985
Vermont - 1985
California - 1986
Nebraska - 1988
Wisconsin - 1988
Alaska - 1989
Connecticut - 1989
Iowa - 1989
Michigan - 1989
Minnesota - 1989
North Dakota - 1989
Oregon - 1989
Virginia - 1989
South Dakota - 1990
Montana - 1991
Utah - 1992
Illinois - 1993
Maryland - 1993
Nevada - 1993
Washington - 1993
West Virginia - 1994
Rhode Island - 2002
Delaware - 2003
Pennsylvania - 2005
Ohio - 2009 
Outlawed with effect from 2008 under a law, "Prohibición del castigo físico" (Prohibition of physical punishment), which applies both to parents/guardians and to schools.
- ↑ See e.g. Student/Parent Information Guide and Code of Conduct 2008-2009, Alexander City Schools, Alabama, USA, p.44.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 "Toronto abolishes the strap", Globe and Mail, Toronto, 23 July 1971.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 "External links to present-day school handbooks", World Corporal Punishment Research.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 United Kingdom: Corporal punishment in schools at World Corporal Punishment Research.
- ↑ Isabel Quigly, The Heirs of Tom Brown: The English School Story, Oxford, 1984. ISBN 0192814044
- ↑ John Chandos, Boys Together: English Public Schools 1800-1864, Hutchinson, London, 1984, esp. chapter 11. ISBN 0091392403
- ↑ Mark Gould, "Sparing the rod", The Guardian, London, 9 January 2007.
- ↑ Colin Brown, "Last vestiges of caning swept away", The Independent, London, 25 March 1998.
- ↑ Salomon M. Teitelbaum, "Parental Authority in the Soviet Union", in American Slavic and East European Review, Vol. 4, No. 3/4 (December 1945), pp. 54-69.
- ↑ "Caning? It's not cricket, say the Russians at Rugby", Daily Mail, London, 22 November 1960.
- ↑ "North Korean Defectors Face Huge Challenges", Radio Free Asia, 21 March 2007.
- ↑ China State Report, GITEACPOC, February 2009.
- ↑ Thomas P. Linehan, Communism in Britain, 1920-39: From the cradle to the grave, Manchester University Press, 2007, pp. 32 ff. ISBN 0719071402
- ↑ Adelson, Eric (4 May 2009). "The Principal And The Paddle". Newsweek (New York). http://www.newsweek.com/id/195119. "While suspensions take kids out of the classroom for days, paddling could be done in 15 minutes. "What are we here to do? Educate," Nixon says. "This way there's an immediate response, and the child is right back in the room learning.""
- ↑ One Kentucky study noted, "Out-of-school suspension and expulsion interrupt students' educational progress and remove students from school at a time when they may most need stability and guidance in their lives. Repeated out-of-school suspensions may make it impossible for students to keep up with the curriculum, complete class assignments, and advance from one grade to another." David Richart et al., "Unintended Consequences: The Impact of 'Zero Tolerance' and Other Exclusionary Policies on Kentucky Students", report prepared by the National Institute on Children, Youth & Families at Spalding University in Louisville, KY; the Children's Law Center in Covington, KY; and the Youth Law Center in Washington, D.C.
- ↑ Carol Chmelynski, "Is paddling on its way back?", National School Boards Association, 5 December 1995.
- ↑ "Sometimes we sent a student to the principal's office for a paddling, and I have seen a marvelous clearing of the air with a simple whack on the butt. The offending student realized without resorting to guilt or subterfuge, the seriousness of his transgression." Father Philip Berrigan, quoted in Allen Johnson Jr, "The Aggressive Pacifist", Gambit, New Orleans, 31 December 2002.
- ↑ "A Closer Look at Drug and Violence Prevention Efforts in American Schools: Report on the Study on School Violence and Prevention", U.S. Department of Education, August 2002, p. 51.
- ↑ Poole SR, Ushkow MC, Nader PR, et al. (July 1991). [Expression error: Missing operand for > "The role of the pediatrician in abolishing corporal punishment in schools"]. Pediatrics 88 (1): 162–7. PMID 2057255.
- ↑ "U.S. Organizations Opposed to School Corporal Punishment". The Center for Effective Discipline. http://www.stophitting.com/index.php?page=usorgs.
- ↑ American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on School Health (February 1984). "Corporal punishment in schools". Pediatrics 73 (2): 258. PMID 6599942. http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=6599942.
- ↑ Stein MT, Perrin EL (April 1998). "Guidance for effective discipline. American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health". Pediatrics 101 (4 Pt 1): 723–8. PMID 9521967. http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=9521967.
- ↑ American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on School Health (August 2000). "Corporal punishment in schools". Pediatrics 106 (2 Pt 1): 343. doi:10.1542/peds.106.2.343. PMID 10920163. http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=10920163.
- ↑ [Expression error: Missing operand for > "Corporal punishment in schools. A position paper of the Society for Adolescent Medicine"]. J Adolesc Health 13 (3): 240–6. May 1992. PMID 1498122.
- ↑ Greydanus DE, Pratt HD, Richard Spates C, Blake-Dreher AE, Greydanus-Gearhart MA, Patel DR (May 2003). "Corporal punishment in schools: position paper of the Society for Adolescent Medicine". J Adolesc Health 32 (5): 385–93. doi:10.1016/S1054-139X(03)00042-9. PMID 12729988. http://www.adolescenthealth.org/PositionPaper_Corporal_Punishment_in_Schools.pdf.
- ↑ Resolution on Corporal Punishment, American Psychological Association, 1975.
- ↑ "Advocacy". Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. http://www.rcpch.ac.uk/Policy/Advocacy. Retrieved 2008-08-06.
- ↑ Lynch M (September 2003). "Community pediatrics: role of physicians and organizations". Pediatrics 112 (3 Part 2): 732–4. PMID 12949335. http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=12949335.
- ↑ . doi:10.1192/pb.2.4.62.
- ↑ Hartwell, E.; et al (2005-10-01). "Quality Network for In-patient CAMHS Service Standards 2005/2006" (PDF). http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/pdf/QNIC3a.pdf. Retrieved 2008-08-06.
- ↑ Psychosocial Paediatrics Committee, Canadian Paediatric Society (2004). "Effective discipline for children". Paediatrics & Child Health 9 (1): 37–41. http://www.cps.ca/english/statements/pp/pp04-01.htm#Forms%20of%20discipline.
- ↑ "Legislative assembly questions #0293 - Australian Psychological Society: Punishment and Behaviour Change". Parliament of New South Wales. 1996-10-30. http://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/prod/lc/qalc.nsf/ad22cc96ba50555dca257051007aa5c8/ca25707400260aa3ca25706f0001d5c8!OpenDocument. Retrieved 2008-08-06.
- ↑ "Corporal punishment". National Association of Secondary School Principals. February 2009. http://www.principals.org/s_nassp/sec.asp?DID=47093&CID=33.
- ↑ "Diálogo, premios y penitencias: cómo poner límites sin violencia", El Clarín, 17 December 2005.(Spanish)
- ↑ "En Argentina, del golpe a la convivencia", El Clarín, 10 February 1999. (Spanish)
- ↑ Education Act 2004 (ACT), s7(4)
- ↑ Education Act 1990 (NSW), s47(h), and s3
- ↑ Education Act 1994 (Tas), s82A
- ↑ Education and Training Reform Act 2006 (Vic), s4.3.1, and Education and Training Reform Regulations 2007 (Vic), reg14
- ↑ School Education Regulations, s40, cf Criminal Code Act, s257
- ↑ See Criminal Code Act (Qld), s280
- ↑ See Criminal Code Act (NT), s11
- ↑ Australia State Report, GITEACPOC.
- ↑ Austria State Report, GITEACPOC.
- ↑ "Supreme Court takes strap out of teachers' hands", Edmonton Journal, Alberta, 1 February 2004.
- ↑ Moyers school supplies catalogue, 1971.
- ↑ James FitzGerald, Old Boys: The Powerful Legacy of Upper Canada College, Macfarlane Walter & Ross, Toronto, 1994. ISBN 0921912749
- ↑ Ted Byfield, "Do our new-found ideas on children maybe explain the fact we can't control them?", Alberta Report, Edmonton, 21 October 1996.
- ↑ "Spanking still legal in Canada", Montreal Gazette, Quebec, 23 February 2005.
- ↑ "Peace Wapiti scraps strap", Daily Herald-Tribune, Grande Prairie, Alberta, 19 November 2004.
- ↑ Paul Wiseman, "Chinese schools try to unlearn brutality", USA Today, Washington D.C., 9 May 2000.
- ↑ "New measures taken in schools to improve teacher-student relations", People's Daily, Beijing, 31 July 2005.
- ↑ Czech Republic State Report, GITEACPOC, February 2008.
- ↑ Youssef RM, Attia MS, Kamel MI (October 1998). [Expression error: Missing operand for > "Children experiencing violence. II: Prevalence and determinants of corporal punishment in schools"]. Child Abuse Negl 22 (10): 975–85. PMID 9793720.
- ↑ "The punishments in French schools are impositions and confinements."-- Matthew Arnold (1861) cited in Robert McCole Wilson, A Study of Attitudes Towards Corporal Punishment as an Educational Procedure From the Earliest Times to the Present, Nijmegen University, 1999, 4.3.
- ↑ France State Report, GITEACPOC.
- ↑ "Teacher Fined, Praised for Slap", Time, New York, 14 August 2008.
- ↑ "It's 40 years since corporal punishment got a general boot", translated from Saarbrücker Zeitung, 19 June 1987.
- ↑ Greece State Report, GITEACPOC, November 2006.
- ↑ Nilanjana Bhowmick, "Why India's Teachers Do Not Spare the Rod", Time, New York, 2 May 2009.
- ↑ "Department code on discipline urged", Irish Times, Dublin, 9 April 1999.
- ↑ Italy State Report, GITEACPOC.
- ↑ "Many Japanese Teachers Favor Corporal Punishment", Nichi Bei Times, San Francisco, 21 November 1987.
- ↑ School corporal punishment in Malaysia at World Corporal Punishment Research.
- ↑ Netherlands State Report, GITEACPOC.
- ↑ Philippines State Report, GITEACPOC.
- ↑ Speech by Mr Tharman Shanmugaratnam, Acting Minister for Education.
- ↑ Regulation No 88 under the Schools Regulation Act 1957.
- ↑ Singapore school handbooks on line at World Corporal Punishment Research.
- ↑ South Korea State Report, GITEACPOC.
- ↑ Video clips of schoolboy discipline at World Corporal Punishment Research.
- ↑ Spain State Report, GITEACPOC.
- ↑ "Taiwan corporal punishment banned", BBC News On Line, London, 29 December 2006.
- ↑ "Legality of corporal punishment in Thailand", End Corporal Punishment, February 2009.
- ↑ Guide to LEAs' Corporal Punishment Regulations in England and Wales, Society of Teachers Opposed to Physical Punishment, Croydon, 1979.
- ↑ "Rise and fall of the belt", Sunday Standard, Glasgow, 28 February 1982.
- ↑ Kamal Ahmed, "He could talk his way out of things", The Observer, London, 27 April 2003.
- ↑ "A 'fifth of teachers back caning'", BBC News Online, 3 October 2008.
- ↑ Adi Bloom, "Survey whips up debate on caning", Times Educational Supplement, London, 10 October 2008.
- ↑ Graeme Paton, "Banning the cane started slide in pupil discipline, parents believe", The Daily Telegraph, London, 27 February 2009.
- ↑ 81.0 81.1 Rick Lyman, "In Many Public Schools, the Paddle Is No Relic", New York Times, 30 September 2006.
- ↑ United States - Extracts from State legislation at World Corporal Punishment Research.
- ↑ Iowa statutes, 280.21.
- ↑ 84.0 84.1 84.2 "Corporal Punishment and Paddling Statistics by State and Race", Center for Effective Discipline.
- ↑ Karen Grigsby Bates, "Spanking: A black mother's view", Salon.com, October 1998.
- ↑ David Richart, Kim Brooks, Mark Soler, "Unintended Consequences: The Impact of 'Zero Tolerance' and Other Exclusionary Policies on Kentucky Students", report prepared by the National Institute on Children, Youth & Families at Spalding University in Louisville, KY; the Children's Law Center in Covington, KY; and the Youth Law Center in Washington, D.C.
- ↑ Gregory, J.F. (1995). "Crime of punishment: Racial and gender disparities in the use of corporal punishment in U.S. public schools". Journal of Negro Education 64 (4): 454–462. doi:10.2307/2967267. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3626/is_199510/ai_n8721467. Retrieved 2008-10-30.
- ↑ "Ohio Bans School Corporal Punishment", Center for Effective Discipline, 23 July 2009.
- ↑ Uruguay State Report, GITEACPOC, February 2008.